FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » I think I dislike "UP" possible spoilers

   
Author Topic: I think I dislike "UP" possible spoilers
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
At the scene where Kevin gets taken by the Exlorer person Carl's decision to bring his House to the Falls is somehow implied to be Selfish or morally "wrong", JustBugsMe, I can understand the kid y'know not understanding but that the movie seems to give the impression that this is the Aesop is supports disturbs me, he has every right to feel more for the memory of the love of his life whom he was married to for decades then a random prehistoric bird.

This really bugged me, the movie is "fun" but this part tarnished it for me.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Christine
Member
Member # 8594

 - posted      Profile for Christine   Email Christine         Edit/Delete Post 
He promised the kid he would help the bird.
Posts: 2392 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
It seemed like Flawed delivery.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Christine
Member
Member # 8594

 - posted      Profile for Christine   Email Christine         Edit/Delete Post 
Dunno...seemed pretty straightforward to me.
Posts: 2392 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Synesthesia
Member
Member # 4774

 - posted      Profile for Synesthesia   Email Synesthesia         Edit/Delete Post 
The scene makes sense to me. It wasn't just the bird, he was forming a connection to Russel, it wasn't just about holding on to the memory of his wife, but something bigger.
So that's why he went off to save the bird and help Russel out. Plus he sort of was a kindred spirit anyway, kind of like his younger self. His wife wouldn't have wanted him to just hold on to the house and miss her after all.

Posts: 9942 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lolcats
Member
Member # 12060

 - posted      Profile for lolcats           Edit/Delete Post 
It makes perfect sense to me. Up portrays Carl's grief heartrendingly (especially in the first 20 minutes--I full out cried) and then shows how he lets go of it. His wife is dead... Russell and the bird are in the present. Realizing he has to live in the present and put that first--that's healing.
Posts: 16 | Registered: May 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
*nod* Blayne, what the movie counts on its viewers to understand is that Carl's wife would be horrified to learn that he kept an essentially meaningless (as we see from her scrapbook later) promise to her at the risk of a child's life and/or happiness.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daventor
Member
Member # 11981

 - posted      Profile for daventor           Edit/Delete Post 
I'm probably just repeating what everyone else has stated but, yeah, I think the movie makes you (or at least made me) feel Carl's attachment to his house and objects as symbols of his life with his wife and makes you sympathize with it, but in the end teaches an important TRUTH: material things are just material things, whatever personal sentiment you attach to them; what is MOST important is the relationship you have with the living right now.
Posts: 132 | Registered: Feb 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Samprimary
Member
Member # 8561

 - posted      Profile for Samprimary   Email Samprimary         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I can understand the kid y'know not understanding but that the movie seems to give the impression that this is the Aesop is supports disturbs me
I don't understand this.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
"I can understand the kid, y'know, not understanding -- but that the movie seems to give the impression that this is the Aesop (moral) it supports disturbs me."
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sala
Member
Member # 8980

 - posted      Profile for Sala           Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Tom. I was having difficulty parsing that sentence as well.
Posts: 315 | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sterling
Member
Member # 8096

 - posted      Profile for Sterling   Email Sterling         Edit/Delete Post 
I kind've agree with Blayne's point, though I liked the movie. Aside from when the "choice" is presented to the character, it's not a straight-up choice; he arguably has the power to save his house (and with it the ability to survive in the wilderness and travel about, at least for a limited time), whereas saving the bird means actively taking on a better-equipped foe in their home territory.

That the scout presents it as "you gave her away" is more than slightly unfair. I think Pixar recognizes this, though.

Posts: 3826 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
plaid
Member
Member # 2393

 - posted      Profile for plaid   Email plaid         Edit/Delete Post 
Blayne, this recent thread for "Up" already exists. Please take the time to look for existing threads. You've been starting a lot of threads lately, please reserve your threads for stuff that's more original.
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Blayne Bradley
unregistered


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by TomDavidson:
"I can understand the kid, y'know, not understanding -- but that the movie seems to give the impression that this is the Aesop (moral) it supports disturbs me."

Its like I own a walking universal translator!
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jenny Gardener
Member
Member # 903

 - posted      Profile for Jenny Gardener   Email Jenny Gardener         Edit/Delete Post 
I really need to see this movie.
Posts: 3141 | Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Magson
Member
Member # 2300

 - posted      Profile for Magson   Email Magson         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes Jenny, you do!

I don't give it all the plaudits it's seeming to get from most people. I'd actually put it in the bottom half of my personal "Pixar movies ranked from best to worst" list.

But it's still an amazing movie that I enjoyed both time I saw it, and it will be in my DVD collection when it's released.

Posts: 1323 | Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Synesthesia
Member
Member # 4774

 - posted      Profile for Synesthesia   Email Synesthesia         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Jenny Gardener:
I really need to see this movie.

YES YOU DO! SEE IT RIGHT NOW! Drop everything and SEEEE THIS WONDERFUL MOVIE!
Posts: 9942 | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2