Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » Make Me Laugh

   
Author Topic: Make Me Laugh
Christine
Member
Member # 1646

 - posted      Profile for Christine   Email Christine         Edit/Delete Post 
I've tried writing humor a few times, but it never works. Typically, when I'm trying to be funny people completely miss it, or mostly miss it, or the worst...they don't even realize I was trying to be funny.

Case in point: I wrote a very short (500 word) piece making fun of vampires. I hate vampirse and think the entire concept is ludicrous, especially in the versions of the vampire system in which you create a vampire every time you feed on blood...there'd be nothing but vampires! So I wrote that scenario, thinking it would be, at least, mildly amusing, but most of the responses I got back went on about how vampires were overdone or how the story didn't really work because who were the vampires supposed to feed on? (Apparently thinking I hda missed a gaping logic hole instead of putting it there intentionally.)

But apparently I have something in me that can do humor, because twice now on perfectly serious pieces I've gotten responses suggesting they thought it was a comedy and that I should step up the humor a bit.

Sooooo....how do you do funny? What's the secret? What makes people laugh? Or if it doesn't come naturally to me, should I just forget about it?


Posts: 3567 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
Intellectual humor requires a specific audience to understand. Satire can be completely lost on an unprepared audience. You're not going to get more than a smile from satire humor, but it should spark conversation.

For humor at a level where you want to make people laugh, it is just like any other story device. You set it up, allude to it indirectly then have the character trigger it. Ideally it is the character's personality traits that create the humor.

Sometimes you can pull it off with just one line expressed in a surprising way. A quiet character reacting loudly, etc.. but without violating something we already know about the character. Miko is a Knight of a secluded order whom the protagonist met and convinced to accompany him on his quest to clear the king's name. We establish Miko as a sober, serious contemplative man. When Miko sees a woman with an exposed naval ring, he might have his eyes go wide and mutter "Yeah, baby!" This only works if its the first time in the story that Miko encounters a sparsly dressed woman. We find out a little later that Miko's mother put him in the monastary to try to cure him of a lecherous adolescence.

Slapstick is also good, especially when a panic situation arises. Jumping out of the pilot seat and rushing to the cockpit door, struggling to push it open, when it opens inward.

For good examples of humor in writing, Douglas Adams has no equal. Robert Aspirin(sp) is also a great resource.


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
I think humor needs to take a risk. Since there are no actual vampires*** no one really stands to be offended by your story. Humor has to create dissonance, either point up a logical oxymoron or state a logical truth that creates emotional discomfort. Or something.

Here's how I think the Vampires work. If you've ever been to an Amway presentation, you know that by any extension of logic everyone should be in Amway already. But since they aren't, there has to be some other explanation. Now I don't know exactly how to make this humorous, but if you can somehow draw a parallel between how not everyone is in Amway and not everyone is a vampire, I think there could be some humor potential. Does your piece start specifically with the improbable fact?

I mean, my personal sense of why Amway hasn't taken over the entire American economy is because most people sign up just to get someone to stop talking. Of those who really are interested, a large proportion wake up the morning after.

There are those who make fabulous sums of money, who keep the myth alive. But I think those are harder to explain than the all the normal people.


*** Well, at least in my world. Also, Amway changed its name to something else. So I guess Amway tycoons also don't exist anymore.


Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Christine
Member
Member # 1646

 - posted      Profile for Christine   Email Christine         Edit/Delete Post 
What do you mean satire doesn't get more than a smile? Satire is my favorite form of humor and is the *most* likely to make me laugh uproriously. It's also the form I'd love to know how to do better.

Slapstick, on the other hand, isn't funny to me at all. It stopped being funny when I was aabout 10. It just doesn't do anything for me.

I've read everything Douglas Adams wrote and thought it was all quite funny. Doesn't mean I can replicate it, though. I think timing has something to do with it...


Posts: 3567 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mikemunsil
Member
Member # 2109

 - posted      Profile for mikemunsil   Email mikemunsil         Edit/Delete Post 
humor is a short form, and like all other short forms it depends in part upon the emotional reponse of the reader, but even more to what the reader reads into it.

recently i wrote up a humorous episode with my son, Jean Pierre. early on it there was forecasting that set the stage, then when the punch came through, it evoked an immeidate emotional reaction based upon the reader's experiences.


Posts: 2710 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
On satire I was speaking in general terms, affeccionados will, of course, laugh.

Slapstick will reach the most people. Some of us intellectuals, especially those of us with too much testosterone, still find this funny, too.

Douglas Adams works mostly in short absurdity for his humor. Most people never even notice the long farsical paradoxes in his stories.

Satire is an inside joke meant for a target audience. To the wrong audience it can be mean or just plain stupid. To satirize SF/Fantasy you would have to pick a well known tale ro concept and then go overboard with it. For a single concept satire, carrying this beyond a short story would be difficult. For a multi concept satire, you are looking, more likely, at parody. But Star Trek Parodies are a dime-a-dozen if not cheaper and more common.

Plot humor, Setup, allude, pop, is not so hard, its like any other mechanism.

fantasy:
Hero hears tale of wondrous sword,
A minor character mentions it in passing four chapters later
Hero gets sword to help him slay "The Great Evil".

Sci-fi:
Starfox knows how to wire his fighter engine to accelerate beyond his ships max speed.
Starfox gets reprimanded for messing with his ships wiring.
A starship needs to make a trip in half the time, Starfox shows the ship engineer his trick, ships engineer applies idea to starship.

humor:
Janice and Chuckie had a rivalry six years ago at the science fair, chuckie won.
Janice sees billboards of Chuckies tech invention company. Janice really hates him.
Janice recieves an invitation to work for a secret organizaion on top secret technology.
He arrives to find chuckie, who always looked up to Janice for inspriation but has lived the last 6 years off of one idea because he saw Janice as his muse.

FOr humor take it to extremes. Subtle Will only work with fans who have experienced your humor and know where to look for it.


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
I think I would require some sort of intoxicant to get that Janice and Chuckie... thing. Though it would be funny if she arranged to have Chuckie killed and her order to kill him "crosses in the mail" with the job offer and reveal. Maybe. I'm in an ill humor today.
Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
Humor is extremely subjective.

I tried to read the Terry Pratchett book that is based (loosely) on MACBETH (can't recall the name--indicative of what an impression it made on me) because friends had told me how hilarious it is.

I managed to get through the first chapter or so, noticing where Pratchett was being "funny" without making me laugh once, and then I quit reading.

pantros, I didn't see how any of your three scenarios were intended to be funny. Sorry.

Survivor makes me laugh out loud (not every time, but a lot of the time), and I'm sure others don't even "get" his wit. (For that matter, he may not even intend to be witty. Sorry about that, if that's the case, Survivor.)

Hmm.

That may be part of it. Some people laugh at slapstick (not me). Some people laugh at puns (I love good ones). Some people laugh at absurdities (it depends). Some people laugh at witticisms, as opposed to outright jokes (I love certain expressions of wit). Some people laugh at satire and parody (again, it depends). Some people laugh at black humor (I tend to).

So not only are there different tastes in humor, but there are different kinds of humor.

My philosophy is that appreciating someone else's sense of humor is a necessary and sufficient condition of appreciating that someone. (Which means it goes both ways--if you like the person, you probably share some tastes in humor, and if you share some tastes in humor, you probably like the person. I still like my friends who think Pratchett is hilarous, but we don't share that particular taste in humor. <shrug> )


Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
It's okay Kathleen, the first two were just illustrating the stages if used in other genres. The third was the only one meant to be funny. Clearly, I failed.

Too much off the top of my head without putting in all the little details that made it funny to me. So much for trying to be economic.

Too much stuff trying to get out and my fingers just can't keep up.


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
One of the things I like is subtle, dry humor. I became a quick fan of the now defunct TV series, Firefly, because of the subtle humor in the show. Humor comes from reactions by characters who state something most of us would think and not say aloud.

One of my favorite characters on that show was a big, brawny, crude and crass mercenary named Jayne. He's always loaded down with guns and grenades. In the recently released movie, the characters are assessing a particularly dire situation. One says, "We won't get out of here alive." Jayne, ever the optimist, says, "I might!"

*sigh* I suppose this is another case of "You had to be there."


Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
Joss Whedon is a master of character interaction.

Find a friend who has the Firefly series on DVD, if you are reading this, I am 99% certain you will love the show.

Oh, and see the Serenity movie. The movie, um, displays an excellent example of humor mixed with drama but also shows how to make a story both stand on its own for a new audience while continuing to feed devoted fans what they are looking for. Yeah, thats why you should see it, for the lessons to be learned. See it tonight, Thurdays are great nights to see movies, no lines at the concession stand, good seats available...

Edit: added:

Orson Scott Card loved this movie.

[This message has been edited by pantros (edited October 20, 2005).]


Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AstroStewart
Member
Member # 2597

 - posted      Profile for AstroStewart   Email AstroStewart         Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I'm not sure if it's really possible to learn how to be funny. It either comes to you or it doesn't. It's possible to look at your own sense of humor and maybe amplify that, but as far as "what's funny?" the only real response I can think of is "did it make me laugh? If so, it was funny," and that changes from person to person. The problem is, in my experience, the harder you have to try and really concentrate on being funny, the less likely you will be.

But mostly I'm just thinking of making people laugh in person, not in writing, so maybe I'm comparing apples and oranges. As far as written humor, I personally think that anything written by Dave Barry is pretty hilarious. I'm also a fan of dry, satirical humor, such as The Onion (www.theonion.com) Just my 2 cents.


Posts: 280 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
Jon Stewart on "The Daily Show" is my hero. I watched him go up against Bill O'Reilly in a recent interview. It was hysterical.

His co-reporters gave him good advice. "Next time you see Bill O'Reilly, just curl up in a fetal position and play 'dead'."

[This message has been edited by Elan (edited October 20, 2005).]


Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Christine
Member
Member # 1646

 - posted      Profile for Christine   Email Christine         Edit/Delete Post 
I love the Daily Show! It's one of two shows I watch.

I will say that ever since I started watching that show I'm more in tune with what news pieces can be satirized. I'll be watching the national news or reading something on line and wonder if John Stewart might use it later because it could make for some great jokes.

I still can't come up with the jokes on my own very often. I came up with one very similiar to one Lewis Black came up with either yesterday or the day before when he went on about the Catholic Church trying to figure out which priests were gay...Because it's so important whether they're not having sex with a man or a woman. I laughed and thought, "Hey, that was my idea." Trouble is, Lewis Black has the voice and the presence. I wonder how well it would work in written form.


Posts: 3567 | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AstroStewart
Member
Member # 2597

 - posted      Profile for AstroStewart   Email AstroStewart         Edit/Delete Post 
Ooh, I almost forgot Firefly, it does have wonderful humor, along with other things. I still can't believe it got cancelled, it was such a good show. Yes, Jayne has a wonderfully dry sense of humor, though I often find Mal and Wash's respective senses of humor are wonderful also.

I think my favorite bit of humor from Firefly is the episode for, whatever reason, Jayne doesn't think River and Simon are coming back and he's looking through their belongings for anything of valuable: "Dear diary: Today I was pompous and my sister was crazy. Today we were kidnapped by hill folk, never to be seen again. It was the best day ever."
I was dying of laughter the first time I watched that episode. It still makes me chuckle just thinking about the way he said it.


Posts: 280 | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
I wasn't under the impression that Jon Stewart was trying to "go up against" O'Reilly at all. It looked to me like he started out just trying to have a normal interview. It was the audience, in my opinion, that turned it into some kind of sparring match.

My favorite Firefly scene was in Jaynestown, with the interaction between Book, River, and later, Zoe. River freaked out because Book had his hair down (HUGE and white and crazy) instead of in its normal ponytail. So she's hiding in a cranny of the ship saying, "Too much snow on the roof will cause the ceiling to CAVE IN! His brains are in terrible danger!!!!"

It's my favorite line in the series.

The rest of the scene is hilarious, too. Actually, that whole episode. Actually, the whole series.

Yeah, you definitely have to see Firefly to get some good humor! Oh, and good stories too!


Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
Movies that were apparently supposed to be funny which I didn't get: "Happy, Texas", "The Man who knew too little"... there are a lot of others. I mean, I can on the one hand can laugh at something like "Dumb and Dumber." I think "Happy, Texas" relied to a certain degree on finding gay men really funny. I think there were aspects to "Forrest Gump" which I was supposed to find funnier than I did.
Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
hoptoad
Member
Member # 2145

 - posted      Profile for hoptoad   Email hoptoad         Edit/Delete Post 
Hey,
Don't know how to do humour either.
People get mad at me and call me nasty things.

Just posting to say, I hate vampires too.
Maybe we should write a story about how all people become vampires except just one and he is suddenly the evil monster trying to kill them all.


Oh, and just to add: don't like dragons either, especially vampire dragons.

[This message has been edited by hoptoad (edited October 20, 2005).]


Posts: 1683 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, but the vampire who made the dragon into a vampire must have been a very brave dude. Or tricky.
Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elan
Member
Member # 2442

 - posted      Profile for Elan           Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe there's a story in having a character who runs around killing off people who believe in vampires, and leaving puncture wounds in their necks to give the illusion of vampires. I don't know why. The idea just came to me. It would satiate all you who hate vampire stories, wouldn't it? heh
Posts: 2026 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pantros
Member
Member # 3237

 - posted      Profile for pantros   Email pantros         Edit/Delete Post 
The Anti-Vampophile!

Posts: 370 | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Spaceman
New Member
Member # 9240

 - posted      Profile for Spaceman           Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Slapstick, on the other hand, isn't funny to me at all. It stopped being funny when I was aabout 10. It just doesn't do anything for me.


This is the very definition of the difference between men and women. Hey, Mo!

//

I wish you guys could see the evolving story thread in the 2005 Uncle Orson area.

Soembody started a story about some guy waking up (yes), then he looks out at the mountains. THe next guy posts a segment that says that he's next to a river, and he's looking for the source of the river. The next guy says that the river has turned a shade of crimson, and was hard to see because of the fog, and smells really terrible.

Setup complete. I couldn't help myself. Here is (paraphrased) what I added:

Egad! This must be the Red River Valley! And the source of the river is up ahead, it's Ed, the singing cowboy, and man does his singing stink!

The Marlboro man pulled out a cigarette, only to discover his lighter was out of fluid, so he rode up to Ed, the singing cowboy, and said, "Buddy, can I have a light? I need to keep this river shrouded in smoke."

Or somethign to that effect. Sometimes comedy is just jumping on an opportunity. Now, not all people will find that funny, but it worked in context because all the pieces were laid out for me by other people, and it fit together very well.

(edited to add a bunch of babbling)

[This message has been edited by Spaceman (edited October 20, 2005).]


Posts: 2 | Registered: Aug 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
(For that matter, he may not even intend to be witty. Sorry about that, if that's the case, Survivor.)

Eh, like I said. It isn't about my intentions, it's about whether you're laughing with me or at me

We all do funny things. Having a sense of humor is being able to predict which people will find what funny, and signaling to those people that you're being funny on purpose. Does it always happen by intent? No, many people can do this without any conscious effort. My brother is great at doing something funny, realizing it if funny before anyone else has time to laugh, and signaling that he is also aware that it is funny and thus giving everyone permission to laugh with him.

He's also good at deliberately and spontaneously doing things just to be funny. Like when he came home from his mission, we all met him at the airport. When EDIT (a niece) showed him her giant stuffed Barney, he seized it and without the slightest hesitation threw it down into the luggage carousel's innards. It was deliciously shocking, yet after only a moment's reflection we all realized that it would come back out soon enough. We made him do it again for the camera, and it lost something (but it also gained something from Sam's sheepish "this time they're making me do it" grin).

I think that his ability to easily do such things on purpose developed from his initially unconscious impulse to sense when people were going to laugh at something he'd done.

So what does this have to do with writing? Easy. First, you have to know when people are going to laugh at something. Then you have to figure out ways of hinting that you're smiling too. I remember the vampire story. It was funny, but for the wrong reasons. For one thing, you didn't do any vampire research, because you hate vampire stories too much to ever read them, and it showed. A person trying to satirize a genre despite total ignorance of it is funny...just the wrong kind of funny. Also, the "smart" character was dumb, but not in the ways you intended him to be dumb. He spotted the problems you'd spotted, but couldn't see any of the solutions that most vampire afficionados already know about, because you didn't know about those solutions. Dramatic irony only works if the author is clearly aware of the irony, otherwise it encourages disrespect for the author. That came about because you violated the fundamental rule to "write what you know".

The heart of being funny? You have to be funny. The difference between people laughing at you as opposed to with you isn't what they laugh at, it is whether you are laughing at the same thing. In successful humor, they're still all laughing at you, but they know (or at least imagine) that you are laughing with them.

You have to laugh at yourself a little. Not at your own joke, that never helps. Yourself. When you hint that you're laughing at yourself, you give people permission to laugh without feeling like evil people.

There is also cruel humor. I'm not going to give a lecture on that, because there's already too much of it in the world and I like to pretend that I'm not as evil as I pretend to be

[This message has been edited by Survivor (edited October 21, 2005).]


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kathleen Dalton Woodbury
Administrator
Member # 59

 - posted      Profile for Kathleen Dalton Woodbury   Email Kathleen Dalton Woodbury         Edit/Delete Post 
Well, then, I don't need to apologize because when I laugh at something you say, Survivor, that I perceive as being witty, I perceive myself as laughing WITH you. So, we're okay there.
Posts: 8826 | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jeraliey
Member
Member # 2147

 - posted      Profile for Jeraliey   Email Jeraliey         Edit/Delete Post 
We're not laughing AT you.

We're laughing NEAR you.


Posts: 1041 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Spaceman
New Member
Member # 9240

 - posted      Profile for Spaceman           Edit/Delete Post 
Reminds me of a stand-up routine that Rosanne Barr did before she became big (in a celebrity sort of way).

"The house isn't laughing at you, it's laughing with you."


Posts: 2 | Registered: Aug 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
Even when he was five, Sam had a prescience for the funny. Like when I was driving him somewhere and I took a curve a bit too speedy causing him to have to grapple for balance. I said "Sorry I'm such a bad driver" and he said "Yeah, especially when you're in the front seat."

Also, it's a horrible but true fact that in our culture men are expected to be funny, and women are not. There are notable exceptions, but overwhelmingly its a male trait.

Like Ann Coulter. Is she trying to be funny? Are there people who think she is funny?

[This message has been edited by franc li (edited October 22, 2005).]


Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wbriggs
Member
Member # 2267

 - posted      Profile for wbriggs   Email wbriggs         Edit/Delete Post 
Christine, are you funny in everyday conversations? To me, writing funny is like doing that.
Posts: 2830 | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
Nobody seems to have questioned my mention of a niece named "EDIT". I thought that at least a little funny.

Women tend to find cruel humor more natural. See, men compete directly and bond using informal sociality, part of their biological heritage. Women compete socially and bond directly, part of their own biological heritage.

Like how men won't ask for help and feel like you should only offer help to someone that clearly doesn't need it. It's bizzare and irrational, but that's just how things are. Women, on the other hand, have a lot of trouble being jocular with each other outside of the closest relationships.

So Ann Coulter is being funny, just in deadly earnest Those of us with the cruel sense of humor get it, even when we don't think it's "funny".


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kolona
Member
Member # 1438

 - posted      Profile for Kolona   Email Kolona         Edit/Delete Post 
Ann Coulter is a riot. That people can "get it, even without [thinking] it's funny," which seems to be governed by whether or not you're in sync with her views, indicates how well her humor succeeds.

If she wrote: By creating a nonspecific "right to privacy," Griswold v. Connecticut led like night into day to the famed "constitutional right" to partial birth abortion.

There'd be no humor there. Just a normal statement. But:

"By creating a nonspecific "right to privacy," Griswold v. Connecticut led like night into day to the famed "constitutional right" to stick a fork in a baby's head."

Now there's some humor, albeit dark humor in this particular instance. Humor works well when based on truth. And Ann Coulter is a pro.

She’s also intelligent, which helps increase the humor when she uses the mundane to make a point. For qualifying female public safety officers on strength requirements, she writes, “Another study I've devised involves asking a woman to open a jar of pickles.”

Whether you agree with her politics or not, that’s funny. After all, even a liberal would laugh if Dave Barry wrote it.


Posts: 1810 | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
That thing about putting a fork in a baby's head is something that just isn't funny to me. And I'm the kind of person who will impulsively stab a baby with a fork

The comment about asking a woman to open a jar of pickles is funny, though.


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kolona
Member
Member # 1438

 - posted      Profile for Kolona   Email Kolona         Edit/Delete Post 
Exactly. It's the incongruity of the fork comment -- something decidedly not funny described in an offhand way -- coupled with the truth of the matter that makes it effective. Reducing a concept to its lowest common denominator in language that blows euphemisms out of the water, while tweaking us -- even making us squirm a bit -- with humor, is an art.

And, lest anyone not get it, I do not think sticking babies in the head with a fork -- or scissors or other medical instruments -- is funny. I believe it is infanticide. And so does Ann Coulter.

[This message has been edited by Kolona (edited October 23, 2005).]


Posts: 1810 | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose that the problem was that they use something a lot more, um...well, it's funnier looking than a fork. More, um, over the top, you know?

Like how dropping a piano on a guy is funnier than just a flowerpot.

You ever hear the story about the woman that worked at an abortion clinic for a while, until the day the fetus came out and it was still alive? So the doctor hands her this tiny little squirming pink thing and tells her to chop it to pieces and flush it down the sink. Well of course she balks, hiding behind the fact that it isn't her job to do something like that. So instead she gets to watch him do it. So she quits.

The thing that kills me about that is, what did she think he was doing in there?

Of course, humor is pretty subjective. I'm sure most people don't find that story quite as funny as I did. But sometimes that can be part of the joke, neh?


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AndrewR
Member
Member # 1563

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR   Email AndrewR         Edit/Delete Post 
If you want a better understanding of the different types of humor, I can think of no better book (mainly because I haven't read many) than John Vorhaus' The Comic Toolbox: How to be Funny Even if Your Not. He explains the various types of jokes/funny lines, and the various types of humorous plots.

It's guaranteed to make anyone funnier--but not necessarily funny.


Posts: 180 | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Whether you agree with her politics or not, that’s funny. After all, even a liberal would laugh if Dave Barry wrote it.


The pickles thing would be hilarious if Dave Barry wrote it. But with Ann Coulter, I can never tell if she's being serious or not.

Then again, my in-laws don't find They Might be Giants funny. And they own 3 copies of "Ever After". So funniness is clearly a subjective thing. I'm ashamed to admit it, but I've never seen "Holy Grail" all the way through. I have managed to see and be offended by the farting angels each time I tried to watch it.


Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robyn_Hood
Member
Member # 2083

 - posted      Profile for Robyn_Hood   Email Robyn_Hood         Edit/Delete Post 
Humour is one of the hardest things to do period. Actors find they get the least credit for it, and it is truly harder to make someone laugh than it is to make them cry. Writing it is the same.

I've known a few stand-ups who are convinced that to be funny, you have to be irreverant. Make fun, tear apart, and offend everyone and everything equally and you will get a laugh. Sometimes that is funny, other times it's just stupid.

Comic timing is difficult to develop, but I think it can be developed.

I don't write much that is intentionally humourous. When I do, it often comes across as being forced and then it just falls flat because I tried too hard. Other times, I'll do something dry and glib, and hits the right people the right way.

Being able to identify things that are potentially humourous is one step. Finding a way to communicate that humour is another. I don't know what is availble down in the states as far as stand-up on T.V., but up here there is tons to watch. I can turn on the comedy network any day of the week and watch "Comedy Now!", "Just For Laughs: Comedy Festival", "Just For Laughs: Gags", "Comedy at Club 54" and any other number of stand-up specials. The common thread, often the comics will talk about real things. Experiences everyone has gone through. They find the basic truth in something and then find a way to exagerate it.

The other thing that is important about stand-up, people are prepared to laugh at it. People watching a comedian are expecting to see/hear something funny. Because the expectation is already there, they are more likely to see the humour. In writing humour, if you can signal that something is supposed to be funny, before it happens, then you are more likely to get the laugh.


Posts: 1473 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kolona
Member
Member # 1438

 - posted      Profile for Kolona   Email Kolona         Edit/Delete Post 
True, Survivor, it's not a fork and probably is funnier looking, but people can relate to a fork. Using whatever the thing is called would go over most of our heads. 'Fork' does the job nicely.

The story about the woman in the abortion clinic is humorous in a 'Duh!' sort of way. Which, like the fork comment, brings out the fact that something can be humorous but not funny. I'll go out on a limb and say, though, that anything funny is automatically humorous. The fork thing is humorous, but not funny. The pickle thing is both.

quote:
The pickles thing would be hilarious if Dave Barry wrote it. But with Ann Coulter, I can never tell if she's being serious or not.

Interesting. I think it's funny either way, franc li. With Ann Coulter, though, I'd say there's that basis of truth in all her humor, since she's dead serious about the issues she champions. Dave Barry seems more aimed at simply painting life with comic strokes.

Although, can you picture a growling drill sergeant administering the pickle test? To me, you gotta love it.

Humor is subjective, of course. I've heard a number of people rave about the funniness of The Princess Bride, but the movie did nothing for me. Now each time I watch a forgotten Disney movie called The North Avenue Irregulars, I break up at the scene in which Cloris Leachman breaks her fingernails.

quote:
In writing humour, if you can signal that something is supposed to be funny, before it happens, then you are more likely to get the laugh.

That signal is a trick in itself, Robyn, especially in an otherwise straight piece.


Posts: 1810 | Registered: Jun 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
I hate to go all Mormon here, but how about President Hinkley's talk about the value of forgiveness in this last Conference? I was laughing (quitely, but audibly) by "legislators climbing over each other", and I suspect that a lot of other people were as well. So when he got to...when did everyone start laughing? I think it was "assault with poultry" or somewhere around there.

The thing is, the bursting effect he got was by keeping everyone from laughing for just those few extra seconds. I think that the important thing is that you signal that it's time to laugh before the audience begins laughing, not necessarily before the humor occurs.

Incidentally, it also worked with the theme of the talk because right at that moment, we all understood the poor slob who threw that frozen turkey. Unforgivable...but we understood. Hinkley is the man.

Anyway, I think that FL is right that humor is often contextual. Dave Barry says something, we expect it to be funny, because it's Dave Barry. Ann Coltier says stuff...and we know darn well that she isn't just kidding around. And yet, President Hinkley wasn't kidding around either, he was speaking of very serious matters indeed. He got us to laugh, not just at our judgemental nature, or our sinful nature, or even our inability to laugh, but all three at the same time.

We're laughing at you...but when you laugh with us, we're laughing at ourselves. And that is the most powerful kind of humor.


Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
franc li
Member
Member # 3850

 - posted      Profile for franc li   Email franc li         Edit/Delete Post 
Though in fairness, I believe most of that episode was from an article in the newspaper, as he said something about sharing it with the author's permission. But the delivery was well-timed.
Posts: 366 | Registered: Sep 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Survivor
Member
Member # 213

 - posted      Profile for Survivor   Email Survivor         Edit/Delete Post 
You mean the text itself? Hmmm...that's interesting.
Posts: 8322 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2