To me, that adds more drama, because it adds sortof a mystery dynamic. As the reader continues to read, they begin to wonder and try to fit the pieces together. Its a dynamic that adds excitement and suspense, and is something that would not be there normally if you went in sequental order.

I have to agree though, that reading a story where you start at the end and then work backwards usually just doesn't work. That's not to say it CAN'T work, but it's just plain hard. The only example I can think of is in movie form: Memento.

The fact remains that if you know what your characters are going to do past time X, and then you move back to a previous time, back wards and backwards til the beginning, it would be very difficult to keep the same suspense in the story as it would have had, simply because, at any give time, your characters know what's already happened. If anything crucially, mind-blowingly important and shocking happened a long time ago (the "end" of your story) they would already know about it in chapter 1, and would act accordingly. Unless you play a giant game of "keep information from the reader" we would find this information out far before the end simply by being inside the characters' POVs.

And then, we go lets say 72 hours before, and with a few chapters inbetween interlaced with some children memories. And we work our way up, till the very end, where we're back in the hotel suite.

A example that comes to mind right away is Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, if you've read that. The reason he begins with the last scene is so the reader can judge the main character (Chris) initially, and then see how their judgement changes as they read the book. Eventually you come to the last scene again, the same scene written in a different way, and you've found that your judgement of him has completely changed. It makes the story quite fascinating.

I'm not sure if you mean that sort of structure, or going continually back in time as it's told.

Either way, be aware there is a price to be paid for not going in chronological order to keep readers willing to do all the nonlinear time travel.

It usually is a frame story. You start out with near the end, end the section as it leads up to the beginning of the story and then have some sort of conclusion at the very end of the story/novel that is supported by what happened in the story.

Starting at the end has to be part of some overall structure.

It's very easy to confuse and mislead readers. You're their only source of information, after all. If you're basically doing something just to make it harder for your readers to figure out what's going on, then they'll probably be better off choosing a different author's story.

is to start a story where most stories end. Cleaning up after the big battle, or running your hand through the treasure, or achieving the greatest power, etc.

Those are great places to start and do a story about what happens afterwords.

That starts at the end (sort of). Should it? It's a good hook. It's unusual. This might work better.

The day the evil robot monkeys came, John was at the auto shop.

I guess I don't like it when they start at the end.

Now, I have seen many stories give a glimpse of the ending as a hook. This often works best in first person stories, where the narrator already knows the ending.

Having said all that, I should probably admit that my favorite short story (of mine) is, in fact, told exactly in reverse chronological order. But it's never been sold, so maybe that tells you something too! (It has gotten a frustrating numbers of "This was really good but we can't use it.")