FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » MTV, CBS and what's his name

   
Author Topic: MTV, CBS and what's his name
pooka
Member
Member # 5003

 - posted      Profile for pooka   Email pooka         Edit/Delete Post 
Let me first state that I don't think Janet Jackson was innocent in the shirt ripping incident, nor do I think she was the most guilty party. But in the media frenzy that has followed, she is getting the most - uh - coverage. In fact, I can't even remember the name of the guy who did the ripping.

CBS is being pelted with protest but MTV is not. I guess the FCC problems the protesters hope to press only apply to CBS (and their affiliates) as the broadcasters.

Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Bokonon
Member
Member # 480

 - posted      Profile for Bokonon           Edit/Delete Post 
Justin Timberlake [Smile]

-Bok

Posts: 7021 | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Annie
Member
Member # 295

 - posted      Profile for Annie   Email Annie         Edit/Delete Post 
Justin Trousersnake
Posts: 8504 | Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Dan_raven
Member
Member # 3383

 - posted      Profile for Dan_raven   Email Dan_raven         Edit/Delete Post 
Don't forget they are both owned by the same people.

You have come to expect things like this on MTV.
You have not come to expect things like this from CBS.

Most of the protesters already boycot MTV for purely taste reasons. They, however, don't want this to become commonplace on public airwaves.

The FCC has no legal basis for fining MTV. All MTV did was produce a show. CBS broadcast that show so they are the ones whom the FCC can legally fine.

CBS can then turn around and sue MTV. If they weren't owned by the same company, I'm sure they already would have.

Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Primal Curve
Member
Member # 3587

 - posted      Profile for Primal Curve           Edit/Delete Post 
MTV sucks.
Posts: 4753 | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Javert
Member
Member # 3076

 - posted      Profile for Javert   Email Javert         Edit/Delete Post 
"MTV has done for music what KFC has done for CHICKEN!" -Louis Black

[Big Grin]

Posts: 3852 | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Rappin' Ronnie Reagan
Member
Member # 5626

 - posted      Profile for Rappin' Ronnie Reagan   Email Rappin' Ronnie Reagan         Edit/Delete Post 
Sigh. WHY did it have to be someone from my hometown? Why?
Posts: 1658 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Eruve Nandiriel
Member
Member # 5677

 - posted      Profile for Eruve Nandiriel   Email Eruve Nandiriel         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Don't forget they are both owned by the same people.

Were you referring to MTV and CBS, or Janet Jackson and Justin Timberlake?
[Wink]

Posts: 4174 | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TimeTim
Member
Member # 2768

 - posted      Profile for TimeTim   Email TimeTim         Edit/Delete Post 
[Laugh] [Evil Laugh]
Posts: 218 | Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
odouls268
Member
Member # 2145

 - posted      Profile for odouls268   Email odouls268         Edit/Delete Post 
Oh for crying out loud. It was obviously planned, she had a pasty on, it was funny, who cares? Its no different than lil kim's outfit a couple years ago at the VMA's. she was exponentially more covered than any july day at any beach.

This is ludicrous.

Posts: 2532 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
fugu13
Member
Member # 2859

 - posted      Profile for fugu13   Email fugu13         Edit/Delete Post 
Uh, odouls, it wasn't a pasty. Take a look at a closeup. It was definitely a nipple ring attached by a piercing, and it covered a lot less than a bikini or anything else legal in most states could (interestingly not including New York, where it is allowed by the state for women to go topless whereever men can: http://www.fltimes.com/Main.asp?SectionID=38&SubSectionID=121&ArticleID=1476 ).

Though I agree that its not nearly the big deal that's been made about it.

Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
odouls268
Member
Member # 2145

 - posted      Profile for odouls268   Email odouls268         Edit/Delete Post 
Wow. really? wow.

I stand corrected. I have not taken a look at the closeup, I only saw it the one time. But i take your word for it.

Posts: 2532 | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2