posted
For some time now, the paranoid community has been recommending the Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie (AFDB) for protection against electromagnetic psychotronic mind control carriers
A recent study at MIT has now shown that these beanies may be critically flawed.
As with any ground breaking scientific work, the MIT study has been met with scepticism and has been fully rebutted by AFDB proponents.
Where will it ever end? Will we ever know for certain whether GW Bush used mind control technology to influence the congressional vote to authorize the Iraq war? If we had all worn AFDBs on election day 2004, how would it have influenced the outcome?
Has anyone considered how driving/riding in a HumV influences psychotronic mind control carriers?
Could this explain high abortion rates or homosexual activity?
This could be big, really big!
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, the lack of an AFDB may not explain the cause of homosexuality, but if you wear one it will most likely curb your chances of any homosexual activity.
Posts: 6394 | Registered: Dec 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
I believe that the simple fact that people who have used the word "science" in a sentence can also discuss AFDB's means that we should teach the controversy in high school science classes in Kansas.
My daughter asked me just this weekend: "Wouldn't an AFDB actually concentrate the alien mind-controlling rays?" To which I answered, "No, of course not, dear. Whatever would make you say that?" And then I had to report her to my masters. That's unfortunate; I'll miss her.
Posts: 1862 | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
I propose the following controlled scientific experiment.
We select a sample group of 2^7 practicing homosexuals and divide them randomly into an AFDB group and a control group. The AFDB group will be asked to wear AFDBs 24/7 for the next 6 months while the control group will be allowed to wear any non-aluminum head apparel of their choosing. We hypothesize that which ever group is most susceptable to psychotronic mind control will have the greatest number of abortions.
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Also, the ones WEARING it will have no homosexual encounters while wearing it....
Not because it counters homosexual urges, but because they look so dorky that no one will want them.
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
You never know. I'm sure a Google search would come up with at least one AFDB-Fetish-Porn site.
If not, hey there is a business opportunity out there for someone willing to stoop to the fetishist level.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yet another potential conspiracy (this is way too easy).
quote:A principal aim of the award-winning HMMWV design was initial value and low lifetime costs. To help meet that aim, the body is made entirely of aluminum. In December 1984 the Aluminum Association announced from Washington, DC that the HMMWV was the grand prize winner in the 1984 Automotive Aluminum Engineering Design Competition, for best use of aluminum's light weight, strength and corrosion resistance in an automotive application.
You got it. The Hummer's body is made entirely aluminum. This means that a HumV is essentially an enormouns AFBD. If MIT research is correct, then it is likely that the US government aligned with alien forces has been using the radio wave enhancing features of AFBDs to remotely control the actions of the members of our armed forces. Clearly this is why the gov'ment has been so reluctant to up armor the HumVs in Iraq. Armor almost certainly interfers with the mind control features.
Clearly the introduction of the HumV to the civilian market was an attempt to expand the mind control program. The only question which remains is whether Arnold Schwarzenegger is under control of the government/alien alliance or if he is actually a space alien.
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000
| IP: Logged |
quote:My daughter asked me just this weekend: "Wouldn't an AFDB actually concentrate the alien mind-controlling rays?" To which I answered, "No, of course not, dear. Whatever would make you say that?" And then I had to report her to my masters. That's unfortunate; I'll miss her.