But I'm a bit concerned that the page, as it now stands, hovers at the very edge of eye-crushingly ugly -- which is a shame, because I'd really like to see it be a success.
Is it just me, guys, or IS this site design a bit clunky? I don't like nitpicking -- I usually don't do it uninvited -- but I'm half-tempted to write OSC to ask him to solicit a second professional opinion on the site.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
Trying to explain a semi-complicated concept in tiny fonts in an off-focus location is a bad idea; plus, the list of "issues" isn't even on the screen at 800 by 600. Additionally, the issues should be in the reverse order, newest on top.
I suggest a much simpler way of conveying the desired notion, plus even more information:
Issue 3 -- last updated ________ Issue 2 -- finished on _______ Issue 1 -- finished on _______
And put it in the middle where people will actually see it.
Given how dominating the "frame" is, but the clear desire to use it, I'd only use it on the front page. Use a stripped-down frame for subpages, perhaps say just a series of images across the top, the height of the standard rectangle on the main frame, not using the giant battle school kid ball. This will greatly improve available space and the feeling of clutter information-heavy pages already have.
Putting Issue 1 off to the side on the TOC makes it completely ignorable. "Issue One Table of Contents" should be at the top. Don't use "1", it makes it much harder to read.
*goes off to his Human-Computer Interaction/Design class*
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
...I still have issues with the two different colour green ovals, to put a totally colour-based POV on it.
Posts: 8473 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, the whole frame has serious color issues, but it doesn't look like that's going to be changed in substance.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
On my screen the right column of stuff is completely off the page. I had to side-scroll to see "Issue 1." With the big chunk o' white space in the middle, that stuff could be moved over.
Posts: 9866 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah; the author information is too far off to the side to be really "connected" with the various content, visually. Better to move it much closer.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Teshi: ...I still have issues with the two different colour green ovals, to put a totally colour-based POV on it.
Ugh. Me too. And the font for "Orson Scott Card's" looks out of place, especially with the underlining.
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't have any major problems with it (but I'm easy to please).
Tom, you often point out what you consider to be "bad design" in web sites. I would be interested in seeing you link to a few that you consider to be "good design" so I can compare what you think is good and bad.
posted
I still say the motif of the cover page shouldn't revolve exclusively around OSC's books, since the magazine itself doesn't revolve exclusively around his books.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Other than fugu13's suggestion of reverse ordering so that the newest issue is always on top, the site looks fairly clean to me. But then, I hate sites which look like "Hey, look at me. I'm a webdesigner earning his keep by putting tons of unnecessary flotsam&jetsam on this page so the owner will think he's getting his money's worth of cool stuff." even though all the extraneous clutter will create extra owner uploading cost and extra customer downloading time while making it more difficult for the browsing public to read and use the site, which is the opposite of what any sane owner would want.*
About the only change I would suggest at present is purely aesthetic: shrinking the size of the top and left border illustrations so that they look more abstract, ala the illustrative "woodcut" publishing house logos often found in older books. And even I don't trust my artistic sensibilities to seduce the tastes of the general public.
While some of the other suggested "improvements" might actually be improvements, I'd wait for an actual page to look at before making changes: eg (using underscores to represent the extended blank space)
Title _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by Author Title _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by Author looks considerably different than The Wine has Been Left Open Too Long and the Memory has Gone Flat _ _ _ by Harlan Ellison The Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by Paul Zindell
posted
Hmm yeah, the characters would acutally probably look better with less color, more monochromatic like an actual wood cut, then they wouldn't look like bad Sunday school lesson props anymore.
posted
Note, aspectre, that almost everything I suggested involved removing something . There are plenty of people who call themselves designers who put a whole bunch of stuff up on sites, but good designers realize that design is not about decoration, but matching form and function.
The title/author mismatch can be taken care of by ensuring a minimum reasonable width between the longest title and the author information; having a gigantic fixed width makes it hard to read.
Actually, using a series of . . . . or other visual indicator going partway across the space would do wonders for making it readable.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
Google Amazon iVillage Hatrack River NASA Viewpoint Flickr
Note that I have some quibbles with all of these, but that's because it's easier to quibble than to like something wholeheartedly.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Amazon's going downhill, true. It's because, like eBay, they're trying to offer too much, and trying to make it all visible on the same page. I think the best way to do this is through drop-down or collapsible menus, but this would lock out people with older browsers -- who, in the case of eBay or Amazon, are likely to be customers.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Personally, I think the OSCstory-referential illustrations-as-logos belong. Other than the authors chosen for publication and possibly a few of their friends, readers will be coming to the site because of OSC's imprimateur, and it's implication that the stories will be within the spirit of OSC's writings.
There are thousands of sites for fiction of one sort or another, and hundreds containing at least a few stories by published authors. Problem is that, except possibly for a handful of fans, those authors aren't recognized Names. Would you read a story by aspectre? And that's even if you somehow stumbled on a site which contained it. Heck, I probably wouldn't read it. Except to find out if and what I'd been sleep-typing and sleep-mailing.
Ya need a Name to draw readers into a fiction site, especially a new one. And through serendipity -- having honed ones talents to be capable of exploiting luck when luck occurs -- OSC happens to be a Name. And is willing to lend his Name to the promotion of lesser known authors. That being the case, the more OSC reminds casual browsers that a site is his site, the better it is for the authors being showcased.
Besides, as an even more purely practical point, the more OSC self-promotes, the easier it is to argue that the site is part of his business* -- even as a loss leader -- for the accompanying tax deductions, and not just a hobby for which expenses can't be deducted. And the less it costs OSC to run the site, the more likely it is that it will remain on-line. Which is another big plus for the showcased authors.
* Writing itself is an avocation, a hobby, often more like a full-blown compulsion. The business of authors is selling what they write.
posted
I think the occasional OSC illustration belongs. I think the illustrations in question are unnerving and creepy, though.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote: Other than the authors chosen for publication and possibly a few of their friends, readers will be coming to the site because of OSC's imprimateur, and it's implication that the stories will be within the spirit of OSC's writings.
I never read Asimov's because of Asimov. Quite frankly, I don't care for him.
I read Asimov's because of the stories and the articles and the writing.
Even when Asimov was alive, the magazine wasn't about him. He wrote his editorials, but his 'spirit' certainly didn't seem to suffuse the magazine. The cover of the magazine certainly wsan't all about Asimov and didn't try to convey the message that it was all about Asimov.
What I'm getting from the cover page is that the Medicine Show is going to be around OSC, that the e-zine isn't going to be about SF/Fantasy as it is about OSC. So, unless I'm a big fan and I just want to get more OSC, I wouldn't subscribe.
I agree with Tom that the occasional illustration is fine. However, I would do it in a much more deft way. Perhaps a picture of something AI Jane-ish pulling back a curtain into something that suggested a collage of fantastic possibilities. Maybe not even that specific.
I don't know. It's kind of presumptious for me to say anything. It's not my problem. I'm just thinking out loud.
I wish OSC the best of luck with this. Maybe he can succeed where Ellen Datlow and others have failed.
Posts: 13123 | Registered: Feb 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay, all taste considerations aside, there are some very BAD design choices beind made on that site.
1) Too Many Fonts! You've got a sans-serif (Arial?) font mixed with at least two different serif fonts (Times and that funky one in the name plaque/logo). The one funky font MIGHT be okay if you kept the rest of the type sans-serif. On that note, your art does not mix well with serif fonts - blocky, simple art needs blocky, simple text. So ditch the Times New Roman or whatever it is.
2) The colour pallette values work, but needs more space to be effective. Centering the whole page, or at least getting it away from the left and top edges of the screen will help the colours work better with the background. That goes for the illustrations as well - if you keep 'em, give 'em more space. You don't have to give them a lot more space, just more than they have now.
3) Using white as a background for your readable text may seem like a safe bet, but in this case it is definitley contrasting too much with the graphic border. Try picking a neutral colour from your pallette, pull down the saturation, and change your type colour to create a nice contrast. You should be able to do all that while staying withing the colour space of your design, and it would really help unify the whole thing.
On the upside, I acutally dig the art style, and think it could be very nice if the site layout was reworked a bit.
Posts: 353 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote: Maybe he can succeed where Ellen Datlow and others have failed.
I wouldn't call SciFiction a "failure". First online pro market to be recognized by SFWA and still one of the highest paying markets in the field? I'd say SciFiction, Strange Horizons, ChiZine, and Infinite Matrix are all good examples that online publishing is a viable market.
Posts: 700 | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Many people break all the principles of site design on their own site, Farmgirl. My own site does so DELIBERATELY, for a number of reasons; I would never recommend that a client visit my page to get an idea of what I normally design.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
Its worth pointing out that two common ways of determining if a design was not done by a professional are checking the font size/spacing and the contrast of colors. If the fonts are large but not very spaced out, its an amateur. If the fonts are small with more space, its someone who knows typography. If the colors are very high contrast, its not a professional.
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because its fun, and experimenting with rule violations is one way to find new rules.
Plus, the rules sometimes should be violated, and determining when and how that is appropriate requires violating them a lot in practice and seeing what that leads to.
But on a commercial site which is based around easy, comfortable, regular access to periodically updated, presentationally sensitive information, its not a time to be experimental (unless that's what you're selling).
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
As kat said in another thread, personal sites are for playing. They’re where you get to do all the stuff that you think looks kind of fun but isn’t very professional.
Posts: 9866 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:Because its fun, and experimenting with rule violations is one way to find new rules.
Plus, the rules sometimes should be violated, and determining when and how that is appropriate requires violating them a lot in practice and seeing what that leads to.
Or, as I tell my theory students, you have to learn the rules so that you can know good times and reasons for breaking them.
Posts: 4077 | Registered: Jun 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
The only thing I didn't like was that either the font for "Uncle Orsons Intergalactive Medicine Show" or the style of the frame illustrations would need to change. It looked like it had been written by hand with a mouse, if you know what I mean. Which could be an okay look if it weren't the only thing on the page done that way. I know it is supposed to look like iron pen on parchment, but then it shouldn't be white on green.
Also, the picture of Alvin and Arthur Stewart brought to mind some of the accusations during the witch trial. But that's probably just my OCD. I'm not really sure what would be better. It depends on what the picture is trying to convey. I mean, I didn't mind the Crystal City cover, so there you go.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
A couple of online magazines where I think the design works -- and by that I essentially mean that navigation is decent and the design complements the content.
EDIT: obviously these sites betray my own biases in design -- but they're still good models of how to arrange content.
Obviously, there's only so much time and money that OSC is going to be able to put into design issues.
But even one of the many free templates available would be better that what's there now. There are a lot of designs on Zen Garden that I don't like. But that's a good place to start.
It's not so much the look I object to as the navigation and layout.
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Fans of Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell are very polite. They are charming and highly intelligent. They have excellent dress-sense, and are kind to animals and small children
posted
When you begin a new site with a wonderful design, most people will take it for granted.
But,
If you start out with a not-so-great design, and then improve it later, everyone will just gush about how wonderful the new design is, and kudos to the designer, it will give the letters column something to print, and spark all kinds of lively debate.
Could it be that the design is less than perfect by design?Posts: 10397 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:I actually had no idea those sites existed. Thanks for pointing them out to me.
Strange Horizons claims to have more readers than Asimov's has subscribers, and its free. As are most, if not all of those sites I listed (haven't been to Infinite Matrix or ChiZine lately.)
Posts: 700 | Registered: Feb 2000
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by fugu13: Because its fun, and experimenting with rule violations is one way to find new rules.
Plus, the rules sometimes should be violated, and determining when and how that is appropriate requires violating them a lot in practice and seeing what that leads to.
But on a commercial site which is based around easy, comfortable, regular access to periodically updated, presentationally sensitive information, its not a time to be experimental (unless that's what you're selling).
Don't get me wrong, I completely agree with this. Tom just said that he broke the rules deliberately for a number of reasons, and I wanted to know what the reasons were.
Posts: 5957 | Registered: Oct 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote: Hmm yeah, the characters would acutally probably look better with less color, more monochromatic like an actual wood cut, then they wouldn't look like bad Sunday school lesson props anymore.
Agreed.
The fonts should go together better also, like some of you said. I'm not quite sure what kind of feel the whole site is going for.
Posts: 879 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
This is a complete tangent, but I checked out Strange Horizons (btw, comparing Web stats to subscribers is always a dubious thing -- not that I'm casting asperions on Strange Horizons. I haven't read enough of its content to make a judgement) and, this part of a review of a novel called _The Princess of Roumania_ totally cracked me up.
quote:In Park's story, Roumania is meant to evoke the real Romania. It adds a sense of old-world mystique to the wondrous quality normally associated with a fantasy setting. The novel is not harmed by Park's never having visited the real-world Romania. He has used his imagination to create a world, and then mixed it with names and reputations of real people and places. ....
One of those who would use Miranda to help achieve her own ambitions is the Baroness Ceausescu.
I'm sorry, but that's just hilarious. I mean calling your villainess "Baroness Ceausescu"? Not very subtle. In fact, it's a downright insult to those who actually suffered under that hands of Elena Ceaushescu -- some of them people I know.
Then again, Romania and/or Romanian characters get (mis)used all the time in bad fantasy/action adventure. Even OSC is not immune to this trope.
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |