FacebookTwitter
Hatrack River Forum   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Forum » Active Forums » Books, Films, Food and Culture » Curse Word Taboo (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Curse Word Taboo
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
This is the second time in two days that I find myself arguing against an idea that I espoused when I was in my early 20s.

I guess that there is truth to the old saying "Don't trust anyone over 30".

[ February 17, 2005, 07:36 PM: Message edited by: AntiCool ]

Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
Heh.

I understand that using swear words when dealing with certain people is stupid. I wouldn't use them in a job interview. I wouldn't use them around my parents that much. I wouldn't use them with most people outside my age-group actually.

But I think it's stupid that I don't. And the only reason I don't is because of the irrationality of others.

Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
punwit
Member
Member # 6388

 - posted      Profile for punwit   Email punwit         Edit/Delete Post 
So what stops you from taking a whizz in public?
Posts: 2022 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
As the only reason we think of a cat when someone says "cat" is because we know that's what they mean. However when someone gets offended at hearing **** when it wasn't meant offensively it's because they are mistaken in how it was to be recieved or they are irrational.

And if I used the word "cat" to mean "ice cream", many people would assume I was referring to a feline and respond accordingly. If I said "I really enjoy eating cat with chocolate sauce", it would hardly be irrational if cat lovers took offense even though I meant something entirely different.

What is irrational is that you use a word which has a widely accepted meaning (crude and offensive) and then think it is unreasonable for people to be offended by it.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
So what stops you from taking a whizz in public?
A lack of the proper amount of alcohol.

This has been cured on several occasions.

[ February 17, 2005, 07:42 PM: Message edited by: jebus202 ]

Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And if I used the word "cat" to mean "ice cream", many people would assume I was referring to a feline and respond accordingly. If I said "I really enjoy eating cat with chocolate sauce", it would hardly be irrational if cat lovers took offense even though I meant something entirely different.
That's because they would be mistaken of the intent, which is understandable. However, once they are made aware of the intent, and they still feel insulted that you have just connected the word of the cats they love some much, with the idea of eating them, then they are being irrational.
Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
But I think it's stupid that I don't. And the only reason I don't is because of the irrationality of others.
I can understand that.

But people aren't rational, and there's no point in getting upset that they aren't.

Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
Is it the speakers responsibility to choose words that will be correctly understood or the listeners responsibility to interpolate between the words to obtain correct understanding?
Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
beverly
Member
Member # 6246

 - posted      Profile for beverly   Email beverly         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
But people aren't rational, and there's no point in getting upset that they aren't.
I am *so* glad you came to believe this, Porter. [Kiss]
Posts: 7050 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MichelleEly
Member
Member # 6737

 - posted      Profile for MichelleEly   Email MichelleEly         Edit/Delete Post 
Look at it this way. Let's say I have a friend and she is morbidly obese. Maybe I wake up one day and feel it's my job to discuss the matter with her. I know my goal is not to offend her so I feel perfectly okay in saying:

"Sally, you are really fat. Your clothes hardly fit, your husband doesn't want you anymore, and you can hardly fit in the seat at the theater. And you had 2 pieces of cake the other day - like you needed 2 pieces!"

Am I to be surprised when she tells me to kiss off and runs sobbing out of my house? I mean, I didn't mean to offend her, right? The problem must be with Sally! [Wink]

The point is that intent is only a part of the equation. My knowledge of Sally or how a reasonable person might perceive my words must also - if I am a caring person - be taken into consideration.

I might think F--- is a great way to punctuate my sentences but if Reverend Brown doesn't agree then the fault is not with Reverend Brown. I should have chosen a more appropriate word.

Just like I would skip the fat jokes when I am with my friend Sally. Common courtesy.
Michelle

Posts: 152 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
punwit
Member
Member # 6388

 - posted      Profile for punwit   Email punwit         Edit/Delete Post 
So you sidestepped the question, I'll rephase for you. What prohibits you from urinating precisely when and where you are when the urge hits you?
Posts: 2022 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
Part of communicating effectively is to understand how your words will be received by your audience.
Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
beverly
Member
Member # 6246

 - posted      Profile for beverly   Email beverly         Edit/Delete Post 
MichelleEly: Absolutely. Coming *at least* half-way, if not more, is part of us all getting along in this crazy world.
Posts: 7050 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Is it the speakers responsibility to choose words that will be correctly understood or the listeners responsibility to interpolate between the words to obtain correct understanding?
I think it's easy to understand when I say "I ****ing hate milk" That I don't mean it offensively.

On the other hand, where I to say "**** you" I probably would mean it offensively.

quote:
So you sidestepped the question, I'll rephase for you. What prohibits you from urinating precisely when and where you are when the urge hits you?
Well, I could get a fine from a nice police officer.

But other than that, and the possibility of offending other people, I see no reason why not to.

Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MichelleEly
Member
Member # 6737

 - posted      Profile for MichelleEly   Email MichelleEly         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

Heh.

I understand that using swear words when dealing with certain people is stupid. I wouldn't use them in a job interview. I wouldn't use them around my parents that much. I wouldn't use them with most people outside my age-group actually.

But I think it's stupid that I don't. And the only reason I don't is because of the irrationality of others.

It's irrational for people to not like certain words that you would prefer to use? Okay. If someone were to use racial epithets in front of you and you objected, would you be irrational? Just words.

If someone were to loudly and crudely talk about your mother, no intent to offend you, would you object? Why?

Posts: 152 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Part of communicating effectively is to understand how your words will be received by your audience.
On the other side, it is also important to try to understand what was meant by what was said.

For example, in Brazil, it is no more offensive to say that somebody sure has gained some weight these last few months than it is to tell them that their hair shure has gotten longer. Many missionaries, especially the female ones, really had to learn to not be offended when people said things like that.

So in interacting with you, jebus, I can try to not be offended when you use crude words. But it would be hard for me. It would be even harder for me now that I know that you know how offensive those words are.

Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Fyfe
Member
Member # 937

 - posted      Profile for Fyfe   Email Fyfe         Edit/Delete Post 
So, jebus, you buy into what I may term the "Humpty Dumpty" theory of word use?

quote:
'There's glory for you!'

'I don't know what you mean by "glory,"' Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. 'Of course you don't--till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"'

'But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument,"' Alice objected.

'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less.'

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you CAN make words mean so many different things.'

'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master--that's all.'

-- Through the Looking Glass , Lewis Carroll

Jen

[ February 17, 2005, 07:57 PM: Message edited by: Fyfe ]

Posts: 910 | Registered: May 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Puppy
Member
Member # 6721

 - posted      Profile for Puppy   Email Puppy         Edit/Delete Post 
Expletives — words intended to express crass emotion, anger, and a desire to hurt — are an integral part of our language and our hardwired social behavior. Trying to expunge the expletive from language (in this case, by declaring that no words should be considered offensive) would be very much like trying to expunge the verb or the preposition. You could try to remove the words themselves, but they serve such a vital purpose in communication, that eventually, they would have to be replaced somehow.

One way to express crass emotion is to get up into someone's face and go "AAAAAAAAAAAAGHBLABLABLABLABLABLAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!" and then hit them with a rock. Or, to achieve the same effect, you can just say "F***!" It's the same thing, except one is done with language and one is done without. "F***!" is actually a remarkably effective word, in that it is so very offensive that you can let out a lot of really powerful emotion with a single syllable, rather than with a violent fit.

The desire to express violent emotion is not something that will go away if we remove the linguistic means of doing so. We'll just become less articulate about it. You'll see more scenes of someone biting their lip in frustration and banging on their desk and screaming.

While some people overuse the word "F***!" to the point at which it no longer shocks them, it still serves the same purpose that it did before. It adds weight to an expression, and vents emotion in a satisfying sort of pleasurable way, even when you are used to it. (It's actually kind of like smoking, if you think about it. When you first smell someone else's tobacco smoke, it is noxious and makes you cough. But when you get used to using it, it becomes an important part of how you relax and influence your own frame of mind.)

I suspect (with zero evidence) that it is significant that people with certain psychological disorders feel compelled to curse at inappropriate times. That desire to curse is a natural part of who we are. It's not just something we made up one day.

Posts: 1539 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
punwit
Member
Member # 6388

 - posted      Profile for punwit   Email punwit         Edit/Delete Post 
Are you intentionally missing the point? We all learn rules that govern polite existence. While some rules may be adhered to more strictly than others, it is still a function of society. The reason that some find cursing offensive is the same reason that whizzing against the tree in a crowded park is offensive, it's part of our learned behaviour.

[ February 17, 2005, 07:58 PM: Message edited by: punwit ]

Posts: 2022 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
You belong to two different sub-cultures. One has given F*** and offensive meaning, the other mearly uses as an exclamation point. Both groups assignment is arbitrary as the definition of every word is arbitrary.

If you had no idea that there was another commonly accepted us for F*** and you let it fly in front of your grandmother, then it would be irrational for her to take offense. But you do know that many people define the word in an offensive way, so it is irrational of you to use it around those people when you mean no offense.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
If someone were to loudly and crudely talk about your mother, no intent to offend you, would you object? Why?
I would absolutely not be offended. I could not give a rats ass if you called my mother the town bycicle, if you didn't mean it offensively.

Even if you did it wouldn't phase me as it isn't true.

Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
beverly
Member
Member # 6246

 - posted      Profile for beverly   Email beverly         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
One way to express crass emotion is to get up into someone's face and go "AAAAAAAAAAAAGHBLABLABLABLABLABLAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!" and then hit them with a rock.
[ROFL]

Oh, that was Laugh-Out-Loud-Good.

Posts: 7050 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm so tired of repeating myself.
Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MichelleEly
Member
Member # 6737

 - posted      Profile for MichelleEly   Email MichelleEly         Edit/Delete Post 
Why did you start the thread if you were not willing to defend your position?
Michelle

Posts: 152 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
beverly
Member
Member # 6246

 - posted      Profile for beverly   Email beverly         Edit/Delete Post 
Jebus, we're just gonna have to agree to disagree. Though I strongly suspect that as you get older your opinions on this will change.
Posts: 7050 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
The Rabbit
Member
Member # 671

 - posted      Profile for The Rabbit   Email The Rabbit         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
But other than that, and the possibility of offending other people, I see no reason why not to.
But the entire point using language at all, it to communicate. You are saying that it is irrational for people to understand a word in any other sense than you used it, even when that word has a widely accept different meaning.

If I suddenly decided that I found the word "hair" to be offensive, that would be irrational. But most curse words have been widely used in an offensive manner for decades if not generations. It is irrational for you to expect the rest of society to accept your subcultures redefinition of the word.

Posts: 12591 | Registered: Jan 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
Once again, Geoff comes in and in one post more effectively says what I've been trying to say in a dozen posts.

So, [Cool] for Geoff, [Wall Bash] for me.

Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TomDavidson
Member
Member # 124

 - posted      Profile for TomDavidson   Email TomDavidson         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:

But how is it being impolite to say: "I ****ing hate milk"?

It's impolite in the same way that wearing a hat in church is impolite. It's a tradition that has logical roots but which is largely arbitrary in the modern era.

However, despite its lingering arbitrariness, it's still considered impolite enough that people can't do it without seeming impolite, even if they'd like to insist otherwise.

Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Puppy
Member
Member # 6721

 - posted      Profile for Puppy   Email Puppy         Edit/Delete Post 
Anti, if it makes you feel better, that's what Dagonee and David Bowles are CONSTANTLY doing to me [Smile]
Posts: 1539 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
AntiCool
Member
Member # 7386

 - posted      Profile for AntiCool   Email AntiCool         Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, that does make me feel better. [Smile]
Posts: 1002 | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
advice for robots
Member
Member # 2544

 - posted      Profile for advice for robots           Edit/Delete Post 
I'd [Smile] [Frown] [Embarrassed] [Big Grin] well better go to bed now.
Posts: 5957 | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jebus202
Member
Member # 2524

 - posted      Profile for jebus202   Email jebus202         Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
You belong to two different sub-cultures. One has given F*** and offensive meaning, the other mearly uses as an exclamation point. Both groups assignment is arbitrary as the definition of every word is arbitrary.

If you had no idea that there was another commonly accepted us for F*** and you let it fly in front of your grandmother, then it would be irrational for her to take offense. But you do know that many people define the word in an offensive way, so it is irrational of you to use it around those people when you mean no offense.

Good point. But, I believe most people nowadays, having watched plenty of movies and what not, should be able to understand that many other people use curse words with no intended insult. So why is the responsibility on one sub-culture to be more understanding of another?
Posts: 3564 | Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jonathan Howard
Member
Member # 6934

 - posted      Profile for Jonathan Howard   Email Jonathan Howard         Edit/Delete Post 
It is acceptable to use the word phuq in films. And yt, you'll notice that if anyone calls the judge a phuquing idiot, he or she won't make it out of jail.

I like to put it this way: [Almost] everybody swears, but not in public. It's simply a sort of artificial manner; also on this forum it happens.

If you want a 'phuqued up' metaphor, it's like the Cold War. The US and Russia were supposed to be officially at war (NATO vs Warsaw Pact), but a certain level of peace was maintained, despite each other knowing the other's intentions.

Say we're neighbours, if I see you in the morning leaving home when I am, and I hate you, I will probably wish you "good morning", and you will reply politely, despite me wanting to wish you to "go roll down the phuquing stairs, you scheety, old, damn bastard". You would probably wish my head be rammed up a prostitute's arse by the same token, but you wouldn't say it.

It's called politeness, it's what we use to act nicely to each other. You don't say everything you think, nor do I. If the same concept maintained peace for 50 years, we can maintain peace for 50 years by not swearing and insulting each other needlessly, jumping to conclusions as we swear aimlessly.

JH

Posts: 2978 | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2