Spirits can see spirits, but spirits who see people are rare.

New York had seen people and he wondered if people had ever seen him.

He once met a spirit on Wall Street named Philadelphia Savings Fund Society. She had said, ‘People don’t see spirits, they feel them.’ But, if he had learned anything from his dealings with Philly he had learned this: Spirits tell lies.

He wondered if people lie too.

Atop the Chrysler building, he watched traffic stream below, he thought he could detect some a kind of order in the flow, like those lights knew where they were going.

[Edited to fix typo]

Two things bugged me.
1) he says that he's seen people, but later on, when he's watching the cars, he doesn't know that people are controlling the cars? Sounds pretty inconsistant to me.
2) "He wondered if people lie too." The tense feels wrong--should it be "people lied too"? I'm not sure about this one.

I'm not sure I like the Names of the spirits but I might feel different after seeing more of the story and understand why the names.

*(thought he could detect some a kind of) you have an extra 'a' in there.

I'm not sure I understand the last phrase (like those lights knew where they were going) what lights?

Oh yeah - POV. I understood right away that it was a spirit. That seemed ok.

Anyway my 2cents.

MC

The city-named spirits threw me off for a second but that does not mean it should be changed. I feel confident enough in what you have so far that it would be explained later in the piece. I really liked shortening her name to Philly.

I did not notice any glaring POV issues but then I'm not an expert at that.

I agree with Jaina that it should be "he wondered if people lied too."

I understood the part about the lights. NY cannot dilineate between people and people controlling cars. To him they are two separate entities. That's what I understood, anyway.

I do have to agree though that you are contradicting yourself by first say the spirit has seen people before, but he can't see the people controlling the cars.

Of course we don't know how *often* this spirit sees people, or what he really knows versus what he thinks he knows. Only more text will tell

It looks intriguing. A very interesting concept. Again, not sure about the names but once Philadelphia Savings Fund Society became Philly it was easier.

If you want to send it on to me I'd like to look at the whole thing.

Ok, to the piece....I, too, stumbled over a few things but in this case it was all right. It's weird. I really liked it.

In fact, I saw just one problem:

"... could detect some a kind of order.."

some order? a kind of order? some kind of order?

Anyway, aside from the obvious "oops" if you want people to read this, I would be willing.

You might consider a few stylistic points. Perhaps you could combine paragraphs 2-4 into a single paragraph, instead of breaking them up. It may help the narrative flow.

Perhaps you might consider modifying “rare” at the end of your first sentence to enhance your opening’s drama or mood. For example, “extremely rare”, “exceedingly rare” (for drama), or “the rarest and most lonely of the Disembodied” (for mood; use your own style/metaphors/terms).

You might take another look at a few grammatical points. Paragraph 4 might be smoother with “He wondered if people LIED too.” Maybe place a . or a ; in the final paragraph between “below” and “he”. Perhaps switch from past perfect to past in paragraphs 3: “She said”; “But if learned anything … he learned this”

You’ve probably caught by now the “some a” in your last sentence.

Aside from that, the only thing that bothered me was "New York had seen people and he wondered if people had ever seen him." I'm afraid that I read "New York" as the city, rather than its spirit, and so "he" was simply an unnamed character. I can't say that this misreading wasn't entirely my own fault, and I got it the second time through, but you might consider some sort or rephrasing that would make this mistake impossible.

As you can see there are plenty of typos etc, so I need to clean it up (and kill-off a problem character).