Hatrack River Writers Workshop   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Hatrack River Writers Workshop » Forums » Open Discussions About Writing » Fictionary Fuel for Fiction Writing

   
Author Topic: Fictionary Fuel for Fiction Writing
InarticulateBabbler
Member
Member # 4849

 - posted      Profile for InarticulateBabbler   Email InarticulateBabbler         Edit/Delete Post 
I'm reading Bernard Cornwell's Excalibur (the third book in The Warlord Chronicles) and came across a passage where two fictional characters are discussing the bard's art. It struck me as an important message for us as would be authors. So, submitted for your discussion:

quote:

"Ah, the old style," Prylig said dismissively. "These days, Lady, we seek harmony of words rather than mere volume of sound."

"You should seek both," Guinevere said sharply. "I've no doubt this Taliesan is a master of the old style as well as being skilled a metre, but how can you hold an audience enthralled if all you offer them is clever rhythm? You must make their blood run cold, you must make them cry, you must make them laugh!"

"Any man can make a noise, Lady," Prylig defended his craft, "but it takes a skilled craftsman to imbue words with harmony."

"And soon the only people who can understand the intracacies of the harmony," Guinevere argued, "are other skilled craftsmen, and so you become ever more clever in an effort to impress your fellow poets, but you forget that no one outside the craft has the first notion of what you're doing. Bard chants to bard while the rest of us wonder what all the noise is about. Your task, Prylig, is to keep the people's stories alive, and to do that you cannot be rarefied."

"You would not have us be vulgar, Lady!" Prylig said and, in protest, struck the horsehair strings of his harp.

"I would have you be vulgar with the vulgar, and clever with the clever," Guinevere said, "and both, mark you, at the same time, but if you can only be clever then you deny the people their stories, and if you can only be vulgar then no lord will toss you gold."


In light of recent discussions, I found this to be a profound allegory.

Thoughts?


Posts: 3687 | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
They say Shakespeare used to play to two crowds at the Globe Theatre---the motley in front of the stage, and the nobility up in the box seats. (I say this roughly 'cause I don't know precisely just how the Globe was laid out.)
Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
debhoag
Member
Member # 5493

 - posted      Profile for debhoag   Email debhoag         Edit/Delete Post 
I think it was the motley crew that was in the balcony - hence the term peanut gallery.
Posts: 1304 | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
extrinsic
Member
Member # 8019

 - posted      Profile for extrinsic   Email extrinsic         Edit/Delete Post 
A close read of much of Shakespeare's work reveals the conceits underlying their superficial meanings. My favorite example is one of his Rose sonnets.

From http://www.shakespeare-online.com/sonnets/130.html

"SONNET 130
My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun;
Coral is far more red than her lips' red;
If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun;
If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head.
I have seen roses damask'd, red and white,
But no such roses see I in her cheeks;
And in some perfumes is there more delight
Than in the breath that from my mistress reeks.
I love to hear her speak, yet well I know
That music hath a far more pleasing sound;
I grant I never saw a goddess go;
My mistress, when she walks, treads on the ground:
And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
As any she belied with false compare."

In a time when poets wrote flattering love sonnets to their goddess-like lovers Shakespeare wrote of the earthly mundane beauty of mortal women and satirized his contemporaries' exuberant and befurbelowed prose.

[This message has been edited by extrinsic (edited June 22, 2008).]


Posts: 6037 | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WouldBe
Member
Member # 5682

 - posted      Profile for WouldBe   Email WouldBe         Edit/Delete Post 
Write in layers, to amuse, confound and challenge the readers, at whatever layers they abide.
Posts: 746 | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robert Nowall
Member
Member # 2764

 - posted      Profile for Robert Nowall   Email Robert Nowall         Edit/Delete Post 
"Peanut gallery" is from Howdy, Doody. You can take the origin of that phrase just about any way you want.
Posts: 8809 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
debhoag
Member
Member # 5493

 - posted      Profile for debhoag   Email debhoag         Edit/Delete Post 
I take it you recall that from the original broadcasts? I do think it originated earlier than Howdy Doody. We should hire somebody young and energetic to look up such things for us.

tacked on: according to Wikipedia, it originated in Vaudeville, and was later used on the Howdy Doody show with a slightly altered meaning. NOW i feel better.

[This message has been edited by debhoag (edited June 23, 2008).]


Posts: 1304 | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SchamMan89
Member
Member # 5562

 - posted      Profile for SchamMan89   Email SchamMan89         Edit/Delete Post 
IB...this is something I have noticed with many present day writers. I have met some people that can write extremely impressive prose. So many people have such polished technique that its remarkable. However, that won't appeal to 95% of the population. It really comes down to the story, the characters, and the concepts powering the piece. Techniques just polish it a bit.

It's great to exercise your ability as an artist. However, don't expect readers to care if all you offer is great technique.


Posts: 105 | Registered: Jun 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
InarticulateBabbler
Member
Member # 4849

 - posted      Profile for InarticulateBabbler   Email InarticulateBabbler         Edit/Delete Post 
Exactly. You have to balance both. That's why this snippet was so profound.

It's like the show/tell factor. Sometimes, you have to do both. However redundant it is in a literary community, average readers want to have it spelled out and to see it.


Posts: 3687 | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Hatrack River Home Page

Copyright © 2008 Hatrack River Enterprises Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2