posted
I remember Doctor Who, specifically those seasons in which Tom Baker was playing The Doctor, as being incredibly good. I remember them being funny, well written, and gripping, with the acting being as good as anything else on TV. The special effects were hopelessly cheesy, but that was part of the appeal.
Over the weekend I came across some Doctor Who episodes at my local library. Strangely, none of them featured Tom Baker as The Doctor--I had to choose from William Hartnell, Jon Pertwee, and Peter Davidson. I picked The Daemon, which I haven't seen since about 1982, but which I remembered being pretty good.
It wasn't.
In fact, I'd be willing to say that it was horribly bad. Badly written--the dialogue was unconvincing, and the science in it was horribly wrong. Badly acted--in general I was startled by how poorly acted Jo's character was, as well as the UNIT flunkies that surrounded the doctor during his exile on Earth during the Pertwee years. The stage fighting alone was so bad as to be intertaining. Badly filmed--shots were often murky. Badly mixed--often the music was loud enough that it wasn't possible to hear the dialog over it. Badly edited--frequently various "laws" of editing were violated, making it seem that there were causal relationships between actions that weren't related.
Over all, it was just horrible.
Is The Daemon representative of Dr. Who as a whole, or did I just happen to rent a really bad episode?
I would really, really like to be told that this episode is an anomaly. I remember Dr. Who as being wonderful, and I'd really like to see that affirmed.
So, Hatrack, reassure me (or dash my hopes).
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Who wrote the script? There are some writers who are better and some who are, well, not so better that others.
And I think that part of the wonder of the Doctor is that each actor really plays a different Doctor. I'm a huge fan of Peter Davidson's run, though most people think of Tom Baker as the standard for the Doctor. I would suggest you try one of his early episodes, if they have them. Before that irritation twit Perry joins him.
Posts: 3956 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dr. Who was generally pretty uneven... the Tom Baker years were probably the most consistent for quality (esp. seasons 3-4 -- when Sarah Jane Smith was finishing up and Leela joined up). Usually, in a season of 6 stories, 2 would be great, 2 would be good, 2 would be bad...
The Pertwee years had pretty low budgets, and a lot of stories were padded out to 5, 6, or 7 episodes; the better ones usually only had 4 episodes.
Somewhere there's probably an Internet list of all time favorites... some of mine =
Tom Baker: Genesis of the Daleks Terror of the Zygons The Hand of Fear The Deadly Assassin The Face of Evil The Robots of Death The Invisible Enemy The Image of the Fendahl (?) The Invasion of Time The Pirate Planet The Androids of Tara City of Death Full Circle Warrior's Gate The Keeper of Traken Logopolis
Peter Davison: Castrovalva Earthshock The Five Doctors [something noun] of the Daleks Cazes of Androzani
Colin Baker: [something noun] of the Daleks
Sylvester McCoy: [something noun] of the Daleks Nemesis a couple other ones I forget
yow, amazing how much of this I've still got in my head (I was a big fan when I was a teen and saw everything I could; if I was watching them as an adult I'd be a lot more choosy)
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Actually, I've found that Doctor Who plays better in my memory than through my older eyes. What once was cool, now seems cheesy. I hate to say it about something I once thought was the greatest in sci fi television, but nowadays, it just seems, sort of, amateurish.
Perhaps I'm just jaded.
Posts: 2848 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Celia, it looks like it was written by by Robert Sloman and Barry Letts, using the pseudonym Guy Leopold. Do you know anything about them? Unfortunately, an article about the show referrs to this one as "...one of the finest serials of its era". If that's one of the "finest serieals of its era, I'd hate to have to watch one of the worst.
Interesting that you liked Peter Davidson so much; I always saw him as a fairly flat Doctor. What did you like about his performance? It's been so long since I've seen his Doctor that I can't give you an adult's perspective on it; 1983 Noemon and 2003 Noemon don't always see eye to eye on this sort of thing, happily.
My favorite Dr. Who episodes are:
The Masque of Mandragora The Face of Evil The Talons of Weng-Chiang The Pirate Planet The City of Death (this was probably my single favorite episode. It was written, in part, by Douglas Adams, and John Cleese made an appearance as an art critic) State of Decay
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Eh? Resolved the question as to whether Dr. Who is any good or not? I'm still up in the air about that. I'm hoping for more feedback from celia, honestly.
Also, I've found that a different branch of my county's library system has a copy of The City of Death, so I'm going to get it through intra-system loan and watch it. If it's terrible, I'm going to strongly lean toward feeling disillusioned about Dr. Who in general.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Don't discount camp value! Do me a favor, have a drink or two before watching them. And don't judge on the special effects! BBC is about acting, and if you're lucky you will get a decent script too!
Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, believe me, when it comes to Dr. Who, the cheesier the special effects are, the better. That's one of the things that I feel a little leery about with the new series they're proposing. I'm sure it will have normal, Star Trek level special effects, and I'm not sure I like that.
I'll tell you what--if I don't like The City of Death, I'll rent one more and get good and tipsy before I watch it.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
the celia of 83 is most certainly not the celia of 2003 either.
i think davidson is flat compaired to baker. he was a much more understated character. he had a different kind of distance that the previous regeneration. baker was very charismatic and put on a good show. davidson was quiet and thoughtful, but you never doubted that he cared deeply about all of his companions.
i'm also madly in love with whatever the group of episodes with turlough is called. i know that a lot of the acting is corny, but the concept was intriguing enough to overlook that. at least for me. the doctor knew the whole time that turlough was in league with the enemy, but had faith in him to make the right decisions when it mattered. it's that kind of interesting, but subtle interplay that exist in davidson's earlier episodes that make me like his version of the doctor so much.
i like your plan. city of death is an excellent episode. if you do find you don't like it, well, perhaps you've just outgrown whatever you loved it so much. i haven't. if you have, i hope you can still enjoy the memory of enjoying the doctor.
i'm going to look when i get home and see if i have that specific episode (the one you already watched, that is. i know i have city of death.) if it's the one i think it is, yeah, it wasn't that good.
Posts: 3956 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Celia, it looks like my county's library system only has two Peter Davidson episodes--the first one, Castrovalva, and Earthshock. Of those two, which do you think is most representative of Peter Davidson's Doctor?
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, beleive me, if 2003 Noemon doesn't like Dr. Who I'll still really treasure the show. It, along with Tolkein, Susan Cooper, Marvel comics, and Greek and Norse mythology are the constituent elements of the mythic landscape of my childhood.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
castrovalva is davidson's first episode. i like that one because of the escher-esque city. i don't think it's a good representative episode as the doctor is pretty out of it. he's suffering from "regeneration sickness" or something.
earthshock has a special place in my heart as the episode where my least favorite compainion bites it. that aside, it's a neat episode even if you liked that kid. i'd recommend it of the two.
Posts: 3956 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
Have you seen many of the episodes with Hartnall and Troughton? I've seen a couple of Hartnall episodes, but never a Troughton one.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
tee hee, from the discontinuity guide (which i should really put on my christmas list!):
quote:For a certain age group this story is the most memorable example of 70s Doctor Who. However, The Dæmons isn't really very good.
mpt did a marathon of several regeneration episodes, so i've seen the pilot (an unearthly child) with hartnell and the war games with troughton. i know i'd seen others when i was younger and it was still on witf, but i can't remember them.
Posts: 3956 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have a soft spot for old television shows, especially old science fiction- Doctor Who, Blakes 7 and the old Star Trek. Excellent. Their charm is incredible- nothing like that nowadays. At least nothing I know compares.
posted
The Tom Baker episodes are the only ones I think of as really good. I loved those, and there were always new subtle jokes to catch when watching them over and over. I'm particularly fond of the six segments to the key to time, though Leela was my favorite sidekick, followed by the first Romana. There was at least one Tom Baker episode that was dreadful, though.
The others range from decent to horrendous. I sort of liked Ace and Sylvester what's his name. The two immediately after Tom Baker were both terrible, I thought.
The writing was just great during the Tom Baker era. There were so many clever things tossed in offhand-like. I agree that the cheesiness of the special effects made them better. I think when they got more polished later on it really took away from the whole Dr. Who mystique.
Posts: 968 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
ok, i just can't understand not liking any davidson episodes. the production wasn't that much better. heck, i think tom baker got the best sets and on location stuff (nobody else went to paris). did you at least like the 5 doctors? can you explain the checkerboard puzzle to me?
i couldn't stand the guy after him (colin baker?), but that was because everything was so melodromatic and convoluted and overburdened with the desire to remain consistant rather than tell an interesting story.
Posts: 3956 | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged |
Blake 7 was a great series, that had the very worst possible ending of any series ever.
I wanted to reach into my tv, slap the actors, hunt down the writers, shoot them and stuff their rotting corpses down the throats of whatever producer agreed to it.
After years of a story Arc and character development...they die.
It is a pointless, senseless death at the hands of the good guy.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Blake 7 and Dr. Who of that period, also had another weakness.
Strong Women.
They would introduce a female character (Ayla, Romano,etc) who promised to be strong and powerful,(in Blake 7 there were 2 or 3 fighters from a long line of female fighters.)
By the fifth episode this strong woman spent a lot of time screaming for rescue.
Posts: 11895 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
The one dreadful episode with Tom Baker that I remember was something about the Pleasure Hive or something, I remember disembodied limbs floating around. I don't know what happened that week but that particular show really sucked in the middle of a run of pretty good ones, as I recall.
I detested every Davidson episode I ever saw, including the five Doctors. He was just a very weak Doctor. He had no authority or coolness about him at all. He had none of the REAL Doctor's affinity for technology, and no nifty terminology. I don't remember the checkerboard puzzle, sorry.
The Colin dude who came next was the very worst ever, I think. They kept giving him more and more sidekicks to see if they could generate some interest somehow but it never worked. Perry the whiner was my most detested sidekick ever.
[ October 28, 2003, 06:55 PM: Message edited by: ana kata ]
Posts: 968 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
No, but he just seemed to have no authenticity. He wasn't brilliant and dazzling and funny as Tom Baker's Doctor was. He was rather ineffectual and lame.
I think the time lords are fooling themselves about the whole regeneration thing, thinking they are still themselves afterwards. I believe rather than being reborn, they are transformed into someone else entirely, and the one who was there before dies. The Romanas were poles apart, for instance, and not one of the other Doctors had the charisma and wit and personality that Tom Baker's Doctor had.
Posts: 968 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
In Peter Davidson's defense, Tom Baker would be a terrible act to have to follow. Baker's Doctor was so completely unique, forceful, and long running that he completely redefined the character. Pertwee looks pretty pale in comparison to Baker too, although I think he was considered a strong Doctor in his day.
Celia, I forgot to reply to your post yesterday, but I'm very relieved to hear that The Daemons was considered by many to be a bad episode.
I vaguely remember The Pleasure Hive, but I can't remember whether I liked it or not. I remember all the body parts.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh my g-d - the memories you all bring back - I never even thought that the local library might have Dr. Who - now I'll have to check!
Posts: 5609 | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm half-embarassed/half-proud to admit that I have nearly the entire series of Dr. Who on videotape.
I agree that Tom Baker was the best. I also used to hate Colin Baker, but in retrospect, I think he was a terrific actor ... but the scripts he had to work with bit the big one.
Incidentally, I've heard people laud Blake's 7, Star Cops, and the Doctor Who episodes Face of Evil, Robots of Death, and Image of the Fendahl. You know what all those have in common? Chris Boucher.
Boucher was the script editor for, and wrote the better episodes of, Blake's 7. He was the mastermind behind Star Cops, and he authored those three Dr. Who stories.
BTW, I *loved* the ending of Blake's 7. To me, it ended as it begun: absolutely ground-breaking and iconoclastic. Wonderful!
Blake's 7 started very, very strong for the first two seasons. Then in the third and fourth seasons, they had killed off two good characters (Cally and Gant) and brought in two terrible ones (Dayna and Soolin).
Dayna was particularly bad. She was supposed to be this death machine warrior, yet the actress quite obviously could not fight her way out of a soggy, ripped ... and open paper bag. It was just *painful* to watch her fight. Compare her to, say, Paul Darrow who also seemed not to know how to fight yet clearly took the time to learn for the show so that he *looked* good.
posted
Shan, if you haven't already, try searching under "Dr. Who", "Dr Who", and "Doctor Who". In my library's online card catalog I found different videos under each spelling.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Okay. I know there were little spoiler warnings there, but it's too late, I saw the words before I saw the warnings. *muffled sobs*
I have been so careful not to read ahead in Blakes 7, to watch them all in order (because obviously I was/am not old enough to have seen them originally) so I don't know anything, but now...
I am never ever going to watch the last Blakes 7. This is the second series that I vow never to end (The Next Generation of Star Trek is the first).
I'm kind of glad, too, because, now I'll never have to destroy my tv, and I'll never be reduced to a shaking disbelieving huddle.
I'm also glad because other people know about Blakes 7. I thought I was alone.
Don't worry: I knew the ending too, before I watched it. It only *slightly* detracted from the series. I was still shaking weeks later after watching the last episode.
posted
Shan, good news--you can probably get all the Dr. Who videos you'd like through inter-library loan. I checked with my library last weekend, and they confirmed that inter-library loan isn't limited to books. It'll be a little work, but it'll be cheaper than having to buy all of them.
By the way, I watched Earthshock (I think that's what it's called--the Peter Davidson vs Cybermen episode). It was much better than The Daemons, so I haven't just outgrown the program or something. I'll be watching The City of Death this coming weekend.
My favorite exchange from Earthshock:
Aedric: The ship's going backward in time! [or something to that effect] Navigator: But that's impossible! Aedric: Not when you have an alien device over-riding your computer!
Write that down folks--if you don't want to go backward in time, never allow an alien device to over-ride your computer.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
And, now that his good name has been cleared yet again, The Doctor climbs back into the TARDIS. We here the grinding of machinery as it dissolves out of shot, on its way to another crisis. Posts: 2506 | Registered: Jul 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I watched City of Death last night, and it was everything I could possibly have hoped for--just as fantastic as I remembered. My wife was extremely reluctant to watch it, having sat through part of The Daemons with me, and having walked through the room at the worst points in Earthshock, but she loved it too, and said she'd had no idea Dr. Who could be that good. I'm going to be getting more of my favorites through inter-library loan.
posted
"The City of Death" was one written by Douglas Adams (he borrowed some stuff from it for "Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency"). It's the 4th Doctor (Tom Baker). It's set in Paris, it involves the Mona Lisa and time travel -- an alien named Jaegeroth who's green and only has one eye...
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hmm, my library doesn't do InterLibrary Loan requests for audiovisual stuff, waah; ILL really varies from library to library based on policies and budgets...
Posts: 2911 | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh, I love that one! All the character's names were composers, remember? Count Scarlotti and the henchmen were .... <laughs> I forget, but some obscure Italian composers, I think.
And that was the one where the Doctor was reading his first folio edition of Shakespeare and said "take arms against a sea of troubles? That's a mixed metaphor! I TOLD him that was a mixed metaphor!" <laughs>
Posts: 968 | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Wall Bash]](graemlins/wallbash.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Cry]](graemlins/cry.gif)
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
