posted
I started with Hitchhiker's guide and it was a surprisingly long chain. (Like the previous three, it actually converges on "Mathematics," which I think should be considered the actual page for this rule).
Then I discovered that "Rationality" and "Reason" actually don't work. They just lead to each other, back and forth.
Posts: 4136 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
Lorca Castle Lorca Region of Mercuria Valencian Catalan Language Romance Languages Indo-European Languages Language Family Language Communication Meaning (Philosophy of Language) Philosophy
And try number 2: Powhatan Native American tribes in Virginia The concept of Indian tribes in the United States United States Federalism Politics Group decision making Individual Person Human Taxonomy Science Knowledge Fact Information Sequence Mathematics Quantity Property (philosophy) Modern philosophy Philosophy
posted
I also reached the "Meaning (Philosophy of Language)" article from a random starting point, but the first link goes to "Definition" and then: Meaning (linguistics) Linguistics Human Taxonomy Science Knowledge Fact Information Sequence Mathematics Quantity Property Modern Philosophy Philosophy
My starting point: The Centre for Corporate Public Affairs
Posts: 4287 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
In the paper, all links are treated equally, but the "click on the first hyperlink" exercise demonstrates that that's not true. For example, if I click on the last link on each page, you get a very different sort of chain, jumping from pragmatic to pragmatic, rather than ascending a ladder of abstractions.
Philosophy Rosalind Hursthouse Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson Jerusalem Givat Ram Byzantine Empire Roman Kingdom Consul Aeropagus of Eastern Continental Greece First National Assembly at Epidaurus Filiki Eteria Ali Pasha Topkapi Palace Antalya Sabiha Gokcen International Airport Silk Way Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 Hardpoint Workbench Cast Iron Foundry Welding Residual Stress Neutron Diffraction Bragg's Law Hexagonal Lattice Translational Symmetry Measure Signed Measure Riesz Representation Theorem Uniform Norm C*-algebra Local Quantum Field Theory Light Cone Weyl Tensor Cotton tensor <loop>
<edit>It's also not robust to taking the second, rather than the first, non-italicized, not-parenthetical link.</edit>
Posts: 2926 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
Philosophy Modern Philosophy Property Quantity Mathematics Sequence Informaton Fact Knowledge Science Taxonomy Human Person Individual Group Politics Federalism The United States Kevin Williamson The Vampire Diaries
If you keep going and click the first link on the Philosophy page and so on, it looks back on to taxonomy. And repeat.
Posts: 26077 | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
On the "Quantity" page, I am no longer getting a link to "Property" - instead, I'm in an endless loop of Mathematics -> Quantity -> Magnitude -> Order Theory -> Mathematics.
Viewing the history of the page is actually pretty amusing. "Edited for XKCD," indeed. Posts: 3932 | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged |
Though it seems editing the rule to be "the first link that wasn't already clicked" would still work for most every page.
Posts: 5656 | Registered: Oct 1999
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jeorge: If only the page for "Circular Definition" looped back on itself...
I used to work at a company that converted textbooks and reference books into e-text for a searchable and hypertexted (if that's a word) engine. At one point I was working on the New Oxford Dictionary of English, and I noticed that the definition of "recursive" didn't say "see recursive". So I added it.
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is the devastating but majestic grain laser funny for reasons other than sheer ridiculousness?
Posts: 4136 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
No I got that, I was wondering if "majestic grain" was a particular line I had forgotten or something.
Posts: 4136 | Registered: Aug 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thanks, Breath. (You people really should've kept some order to those threads, you know. Not have everything twice or threefold. That makes it really hard for the random newbie stumbling through the open barn door... )
Posts: 366 | Registered: May 2016
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm pretty confident in current scientific consensus on the pyramids et al. I'm curious why you're not.
Posts: 572 | Registered: Jun 2013
| IP: Logged |
posted
But on a more serious note, just because they were born 4000 years ago doesn't mean that they were retarded. They had their geniuses and they had the benefit of slave/taxed labor. Add up the two and it was more then possible to build the pyramids.
Posts: 572 | Registered: Jun 2013
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Heisenberg: But on a more serious note, just because they were born 4000 years ago doesn't mean that they were retarded. They had their geniuses and they had the benefit of slave/taxed labor. Add up the two and it was more then possible to build the pyramids.
They also didn't have Netflix to entertain them. Lots of time to figure things out.
Posts: 1757 | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
So...everyone just caught "giant rock fevor" on several continents at the same time...hey, put down that copper tool and help me move this 90 ton stone...sometimes up mountains...hundreds of miles...no wheels...no problem! Occam grew a beard.
Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Pyramids built on aquifer, large dark energy generators, cap stones were insulators...forgotten technology...lots and lots of evidence that makes current accepted theories look silly.
Watch the first ten min...experts of good quality, production value & music too.
Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Stone_Wolf_: Pyramids built on aquifer, large dark energy generators, cap stones were insulators...forgotten technology...lots and lots of evidence that makes current accepted theories look silly.
I think your silly detector might need re-calibrating.
Posts: 9866 | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Stone_Wolf_: Pyramids built on aquifer, large dark energy generators, cap stones were insulators...forgotten technology...lots and lots of evidence that makes current accepted theories look silly.
Watch the first ten min...experts of good quality, production value & music too.
how specifically do you think the pyramids were made
what is all this stuff
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dude, what tech do you think "the ancients" possessed that they wasted on building heaps of rock?
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[ROFL]](graemlins/rofl.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
