posted
What is with these dang Americans and switching the order of verb phrases? For example:
quote:Unemployment and disorganization still are hallmarks of many towns and cities in Iraq.
Are still, dammit! This is something like the third time I've come across a reversal just today, and it's not as though I've had time to read a lot. Is this supposed to look distinguished, or intellectual, or something? Like bloody Yoda it looks.
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
Edit: Not only does the reversal not impede communication, it actually serves a useful function. It puts emphasis on the 'still'.
Posts: 2705 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
It doesn't? That's kind of surprising, since I understood both the original sentence and what you just said without any difficulty.
Posts: 2705 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I guess when used as an adverb, "still" always comes before the verb, except when it is modifying "to be". "Are" is a form of "to be", so you are correct.
I don't know. The confusion is simple, if still always comes before the verb with every other word. <Ex: The Train still hasn't arrived.>
Hmm...this only makes sense from a proscritivist standpoint. Real world language use is decriptivist in use of colloquialism. And it does serve a function to reverse the word order (to add emphasis), even if it isn't technically correct.
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by JonHecht: It doesn't? That's kind of surprising, since I understood both the original sentence and what you just said without any difficulty.
And you also understand, but that not make correct.
Posts: 10645 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, and the proliferation of adding "y" to nouns, in order to make them adjectives (attributed to Joss Whedon) is incorrect too. But it enlivens the language and makes it more colorful. That's the difference between a living (changing through use) and a dead language.
Oh, if the Welsh only had your problems!!!
I say that King of Men gets defenestrated. We can do it in a very actiony manner. Even though we'll probably hear a lot of grumbleage from him.
Posts: 1204 | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
That one I actually take issue with, since it took me a few seconds to realize what you were trying to say. Again, so long as understanding is not impeded, I'm fine.
There are many cases where it is perfectly acceptable for a noun (or pronoun) to be elliptical as long as the meaning is clear; the sentence you chose just happens to be especially weird because "understand" can be used both transitively and intransitively.
Edit: Never mind about 'understand' being both trans and intrans. I thought about it a bit more and realized that it just seems intransitive sometimes because it is so often used elliptically.
Edit2: Interestingly, I looked it up and some dictionaries mark 'understand' as both trans and intrans, but I really think that this is incorrect, as all the examples that are provided just have implicit objects.
Posts: 2705 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by King of Men: What is with these dang Americans and switching the order of verb phrases? For example:
quote:Unemployment and disorganization still are hallmarks of many towns and cities in Iraq.
Are still, dammit! This is something like the third time I've come across a reversal just today, and it's not as though I've had time to read a lot. Is this supposed to look distinguished, or intellectual, or something? Like bloody Yoda it looks.
Putting the adverb before the verb is a weird journalistic tic. Don't ask me why they do it—it's probably based on some faulty idea of what sounds punchier or something. But it produces constructions ranging from mildly awkward to downright awful, such as "Apple Monday announced the new iPhone." Huh? What the heck is Apple Monday? Were they Apple on Monday and some other name on different days of the week?
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
That doesn't sound like much of a feast. Are tears a good source of protein, carbohydrates, or other nutrients?
Posts: 9945 | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
"Apple Monday announced the new iPhone." The problem is that it should be "Apple, Monday, announced the new iPhone."
Posts: 2705 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Word switching doesn't bother me. It changes the stress.
Those who dislike it are prejudiced against music.
What gets on my nerves is "Everything in the world is not about you." Well, goodness. Surely some things in the world are about me. Like, your sentence. I think what you meant was: "Not everything in the world is about you."
I don't know which is more grammatically sound. But I know which one I understand.
Posts: 196 | Registered: Jun 2009
| IP: Logged |
posted
Adverbs are actually pretty flexible in terms of order. Actually, adverbs are pretty flexible in terms of order. Adverbs are pretty flexible in terms of order, actually.
Posts: 47 | Registered: Apr 2011
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jon Boy: Ugh. Still awful.
Are you the one with the pedantry blog?
Yup! This does not mean, however, that I am not entitled to have opinions on language.
And anyway, I have facts to back up my opinion. The "[subj] [adv] [verb]" construction is definitely a weird feature of news writing. Notice that almost all of the spoken hits are from TV news:
posted
Also I can speak from experience, not only does Jon Boy know how to write, his spoken English is pleasantly accented. He could command the elements if he spoke loudly enough. Fortunately, he is soft-spoken.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
