posted                  

quote:

---

The video shows him demonstrating on a concrete pad, undoubtedly because it's easier and more dramatic, and lets him use a smaller fulcrum, but when it shows him moving a barn with the same technique it's over grass.

---

Just because he's doing it on a hard surface doesn't mean it only works on a hard surface. He didn't move the barn over a hard surface, it's clearly moving over a field. On the 2nd link, which is his website, it specifies it's a muddy field so he had to go pretty slowly. If he'd done it when the ground was frozen, he would have been able to go faster.

(Also, you probably shouldn't call people with gender neutral names "brother." Just sayin'. )

Posts: 7954 | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                   

quote:

---

Originally posted by Samprimary:
Stone_wolf, i want you to make two complete lists for us so that we're not just chasing down your "some people say" or "nobody can REALLY prove" shit.

The first list should be "things Stone Wolf believe is true about the ancient structures that modern science/archaeology deny"

The second list should be "things Stone Wolf thinks that are false about the current archaeological record of the ancient structures"

---

Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                  

quote:

---

Originally posted by Samprimary:
What might happen to a tomb that you can think of to cause the tomb to not have mummies and artifacts in it?

Why can you not carve granite and dolemite with copper tools, when it is possible to carve granite and dolemite with stone tools?

What is a "Ponu Ponku?"

What evidence exists for the eight mile move of the Nile that makes the current dating of the pyramids' construction wrong?

---

There is a difference between a looted tomb and an the internal spaces of a broken engine...

"...Puma Punku (also called “Puma Pumku” or “Puma Puncu”). It is part of a large temple complex or monument group that is part of the Tiwanaku archaeological site near Tiwanaku, Bolivia.

Yes, I know the sourse is questionable...but the physical location should be accurate.

The 8 mile Nile drift is covered in the Pyramid Code...which you watched so...

Posts: 6683 | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | 

posted                   

quote:

---

AA: “This surface is as smooth as a table top, like in your kitchen. There’s no wave to it. This was machined.”

The sandstone and andesite stones at Pumapunku would have been easily worked with the most basic stone working tools, the idea that diamond tipped power saws were needed is ridiculous. The red sandstone was relatively soft and easy to work with, and even though andesite is pretty hard, because of the way it cooled it could be easily flaked off using stones as soft as 5.5 on the Mohs scale. Such pounding stones were found all over andesite quarries in the area.

Contrary to Ancient Aliens’ claims that archeologists are baffled by Pumapunku, Archeologists know the basics about how Pumapunku’s stones were cut and shaped. This is partly because there is evidence for this all over the site itself.

They actually used a method that almost all ancient stone workers used. They used hard -pounding stones to pound out troth like depressions; later on they used flat stones and sand to grind the stone to make a polished surface. We will see later on that this is also how the Egyptians, 1000’s of years before this, made their flat surfaced granite monuments like obelisks.

Sand, as we will see later when we look at Egypt, has extremely hard particles in it and, if placed between a flat surface and a rock, can polish even the hardest stones known to man. In fact, the harder the stone is the better it can be polished using sand.

We will also see that how sand can turn a piece of copper into a very efficient granite saw or granite drill – a method which the Egyptians utilized quite well.

Some stones at Pumapunku that Ancient Aliens would never show the cameras are the ones that were in the middle of this process. They show that at the same time a stone was being pounded by stone hammers, which created these troth like depressions, the grinding and polishing was taking place on the other end of the stone. Unfinished stones like this one clearly show how they were shaped – and it wasn’t with lasers.

There is also unmistakable evidence of stone hammers having been used in the places that were never meant to be visible, like where certain stones would be connected with one another. And because of that, it’s hard for me to believe Eric Von Daniken’s next claim, because it would mean that the alien tool box had a laser gun right next to a stone hammer.

---

Posts: 11187 | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged |