posted
Chad, your "change the channel if you don't like the tune" analogy doesn't work. I can avoid Howard Stern quite easily by changing the station. But given your prolific participation in all political threads, I would have to do a lot of scrolling to avoid your posts.
Posts: 1592 | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
quote:It's because I am all powerful! I can make them read! I can make them post! They can't help themselves. I really shouldn't flex my all powerful self at them as much as I do, but if you read my threads, you know who my victims are!
They truly, and honestly can't NOT post. They have to. Don't blame them. I force them with my powers!
See I made the people in this thread call me names!
Behold the Power of Chad!
MWWwwwhaahahahahaha
Yes...Banna I do believe I get it now!
Chad
You need to at least seriously reply. It would be the respectful thing to do.
Posts: 3771 | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dagonee, sorry I didn't spell it out for you because I didn't think anyone would start "jumping to assumptions".
Do you want me to make that directed at you? It seems like you do. Your follow up post to that as well seems to indicate you wanted some "direct" response.
Well, suprise, suprise, the thread was only one thing that helped me change my mind. The stupid people were everyone in general who would abuse the legal system to force their beliefs on the Majority?
Are you one of those?
Maybe you are, but I didn't get the feeling in the thread that people in the thread were going to abuse the legal system to push their agendas.
And dagonee, there are about a thousand unanswered questions out there I have asked, but I don't press them.
If this is so important to you, please let me know how I can help you.
You are obviously very distraught because you think I was perhaps targetting you directly or indirectly.
Be at ease, for that is not the case. As stated above, it was directed at those who abuse the legal system, and which person in the thread fit that description?
Please don't be distraught and put your heart at ease. Let not your feelings be hurt for it was not to you that the post was intended.
Your replies in that thread only showed that the reason for "compromise" wouldn't be valid.
Posts: 1533 | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
You know, the topic/person of discussion in this thread is why I haven't been willing to spend much of my time on Hatrack lately. The posts can't be ignored because they're everywhere, so that makes me want to go somewhere else.
posted
*sigh* you've issued apologies before Chad. But even the apology is arrogant,
For example:
quote: Please don't be distraught and put your heart at ease. Let not your feelings be hurt for it was not to you that the post was intended.
I have no real hope you will change at this point.
quote: As stated above, it was directed at those who abuse the legal system, and which person in the thread fit that description?
If no one in the thread fit that description what was the worth in posting it. Posting something IN a thread implies it is relevant to the discussion somehow. If it wasn't intended directly at anybody why bother? You didn't make it clear at the time that it was "only to those who abuse the legal system". You posted it on a thread giving the appearance that it was generally aimed at everyone who had posted on it prior to your sweeping generality. And as you can see that is how we took it! Unless you begin to demonstrate a willingness to avoid sweeping generalizations there will be problems.
posted
AJ, I think the mistake we're making is in assuming Chad fully comprehends the English language. Apparantly "The comments on this thread have changed my mind" includes a silent "and other things too bothersome to mention" after the fifth word in Chad-speak.
and vwiggin's feet stink. VW how come whenever i bring up your stinky feet you just keep repeating that the feet-aware are a bunch of losers?
Posts: 1572 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
I've had to come to grips lately with the mistaken idea that having a home and family seemed to validate some of the jerky stuff I did and said around others, when in reality I was just ticking people off. I'd say something in a conversation as a gambit into iffy territory and then look to my wife to see if I had crossed the line, and when she didn't react I'd keep going.
I go through phases like that, in which I think that having accomplished certain milestones affords me the liberty of getting loose with my tongue.
Yeah, the spouse and kids may want to cuddle and play when we get home. Does that mean we weren't jerks today?
Posts: 2655 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Huh. If you hadn't been dumb enough to stick a glowing jewel in the face of a raving werewolf you'd have both your hands.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
You're just bigoted against man-elf relationships. Especially when that man is a hot chunk of manly love.
Posts: 1592 | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is anyone else mesmerized by that dancing wolf? It's so peaceful.
skillery, I always have a soft spot for people with spouse and children to go home to. Part of it is because I'm single, and I'm jealous!
Another part is because when a man says he is going home to his family, I'm reminded that no matter what I think of the guy, someone, somewhere loved him enough to marry him. So they can't be all bad.
Posts: 1592 | Registered: May 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
You know, I have a relatively simple question (really, set of questions) for Chad.
How many forums have you found that don't consider your argumentative style abusive and insulting? How many have you tried? Do you think this suggests anything? If so, what?
Posts: 15770 | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote: But if I make a certain viewpoint look stupid. It's not my fault that it's one you hold. It's yours.
I would encourage anyone to look up my threads to see if I attacked anyone personally.
You will find that it is others like Tom or Ben or Kwea who have nothing other than "name calling" to depend on.
They can do it all they want. It reflects on THEM, not me.
But if you are looking for someone who will abandon their viewpoints because it gets attacked, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Chad...that does it.....you are a complete waste of skin.
You have never successfully refuted a single point on this board, and I could post more than a dozen examples of you calling someone names without provocation.
The only time you have ever made me feel stupid is right now....because I can't figure out why I have bothered replying to your posts at all.
I have argued with 4 year olds who use better rhetoric, and 10 year olds with a better grasp of international politics. Your "facts" are, at best, overly simplistic, and at worse complete fabrications.
You are rude, ignorant, and arrogant...and I can't for see why you have such a high opinion of yourself...
Because no one else here shares it with you.
Feel free to continue as you have, as you make a better argument against yourself with every post than I ever could alone.
One question....
If you don't care so much, why bother coming here and posting?
Once again...if you are going to lie, please put some effort into it, and be a little less transparent.