posted
I'm reading this classic by Heinlein. It's another one of those books that's been on my shelf for years and years and I finally picked it up. What a great read! Funny and philosophical. I'm about halfway through. I assume a few of you guys and gals have read this...what do you think?
Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I keep waiting for one of those sex churches to open in my neighborhood. Definitely a religion I could sink my teeth into.
Posts: 270 | Registered: Jul 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I really liked the first half of that book, but the second half didn't do as much for me for some reason.
Posts: 2867 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Like Castenada, this book was very influential in the Free love, Drug, Ohhming hippy movement... and like Castenada its point is as totally missed as that of Starship Troopers by most people.
Learning to Grok.. that is a discipline as high as learning higher math in five ancient human languages. Learning the Martian tounge was almost impossible for a human but once done the gift was a 'Map' to reality that opened many doors to perception and latent abilities.
In short Discipline begets Power. Yet people get bogged down in the Free Sharing aspect of it that is just an aspect of trivializing the possession aspect of love.
I wonder what you thought Temp when Jubal refered to Homosexuals and "Poor inbetweeners" and thought Micheal would "Grok Wrongness" in them?
posted
Well, since even Jubal learned better in the end.....
Funny how you think that what matters to YOU is serious but the main point to others is trivial....
I liked the book, but it was a little over the top for me.
However, since the last 2/3 of the book was about explaining what Grokking is, and explaining the communal lifestyle that allows humans to learn it, I wouldn't call that a trivial aspect of the book.
Also, Castanada was an idiot, and his books were suppose to be about teaching an actual, specific path to power.....SIASL isn't the same thing at all, for all of it's metaphysical bullshit.
Yes, I have read both, BTW. Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote: I liked the book, but it was a little over the top for me.
Most of Heinlein's novels are that way for me. I like a lot of his short stories, but I haven't found a book of his that I've been able to actually tolerate.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
posted
I like his ideas, even when I don't agree with them, and some of them are very interesting reads, but I have always found him pretentious and over the top a bit.
Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
His portrayal of women is awful and, unfortunately, does not change from book to book. Other than that, I loved it. Jubal rocks.
Posts: 1215 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I know at least one woman who would disagree . . .
-o-
I really liked Stranger when I read it. I read it several times, but it's been over fifteen years, and so I'm not certain if I would still enjoy it as much. I think it's almost better for me not to reread it, and remember the perhaps mythical Stranger of my memory. Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
I love Varley. I've been reading him ever since "The Barbie Murders" came out. I've even read and reread the Titan trilogy (which caused me a lot of deja vu when Xena came around). Red Thunder was so different from his old stuff.
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Learning to Grok.. that is a discipline as high as learning higher math in five ancient human languages. Learning the Martian tounge was almost impossible for a human but once done the gift was a 'Map' to reality that opened many doors to perception and latent abilities.
Interesting... reminds me of what was said of the Talon language in "Earth: Final Conflict". Obviously they gave tribute to the Martian language. Posts: 4953 | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Reading Hienlien is interesting because so many science fiction devices and cliches originated in his stories.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
Alien parasites that infect us and then take over our nervous system infiltrate us and try to take over humanity.
Posts: 16551 | Registered: Feb 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
I like the book, partly because it's the only example I can think of where one character expressed an extended point of view and another disagreed intelligently. I get really tired of Heinlein's "X is y, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot!" "You're sure right about that! How could anyone not think x is y?" "Well, I just don't know. X is so clearly and implicitly y, it's beyond argument..." conversations.
But I do think the conversation about humor is an oversimplification.
Posts: 3826 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't HATE Heinlein. I just think he often engaged in self-indulgent wish fulfillment, and that his longer fiction -- especially novels -- was especially prone to this flaw. Moreover, he was NOT a character writer, and not even a political theorist (although he fancied himself both); he was an idea geek, and was at his best when basically ticking off, in simple language, a catalog of his ideas.
Posts: 37449 | Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged |
Did Heinlein think of all of these first? If so, in which books?
I just started reading Heinlein a couple days ago when I got books from him as presents. I'm reading Citizen of the Galaxy right now and I'm loving it.
Posts: 2054 | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
Waterbeds may be from the same place. I did read somewhere that the guy who made the first real waterbed took out a patent for the concept--in Heinlein's name, since that's where he got the idea from.
Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
"The Roads Must Roll," but freedictionary.com gives Wells credit for coming up with them first.
Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
This site gives Heinlein credit for imagining air dryers, cold-rest/cold-sleep, cyborgs (arguably Frankenstein was a cyborg, no? Maybe Heinlein coined the phrase?), CAD (in the form of Drafting Dan, from Door Into Summer), Eetee as a phrase for extraterrestrials, flying saucers (?), screen savers, photovoltaic cells used to power vehicles, traffic control cameras, the microwave, prepackaged microwave meals, and pocketphones.
Now, I don't know just how seriously to take all of that, but then, he was an idea man at the start of modern science fiction, so he was coming up with what the future would look like before anybody else except Asimov had a shot at it.
Posts: 13680 | Registered: Mar 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ahhh....BC, YOU are the one trying to prove someone's ideas are worth learning...how about YOU provide an example?
As soon as you learn AP from those books let me know what I just wrote on this peice of paper in front of me and perhaps I will believe you.
On a completely different note, if Discipline and Power are what make you what you today perhaps I should be grateful for noticing it was snake oil when I read it. Posts: 15082 | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Icarus: This site gives Heinlein credit for imagining air dryers, cold-rest/cold-sleep, cyborgs (arguably Frankenstein was a cyborg, no?
Did the monster have mechanical parts? I'm sure Frankenstein himself didn't.
quote:Originally posted by Icarus: Now, I don't know just how seriously to take all of that, but then, he was an idea man at the start of modern science fiction, so he was coming up with what the future would look like before anybody else except Asimov had a shot at it.
You should find a copy of Fred Pohl's The Way the Future Was. It's an amazing depiction of how the field got started. Heinlein may have been the first Grand Master, but he was far from the first guy in modern science fiction.
He did have some amazing ideas, though. I remember how shocked I was when he died. To this day, I have a sneaking suspicion that he's a Howard, and that he just faked his death...
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
He said that people who don't understand higher math aren't really human, they may have been housebroken but they don't count as human beings.
Point of order: Heinlein did not say he believed that, one of his characters did (Lazurus Long). While Heinlein may have believed it, at least one writer -- and I'll remember his name eventually -- said that when he brought up his mathematical illiteracy because of that quote Heinlein reassured him he was still a fine person anyway Posts: 7790 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
Friday was the first Heinlein book I ever read. I really identified with her feelings of being less than human. And the fact that she was bi was amazing to me as I don't recall ever reading about a bisexual character before then.
posted
I think Friday is an allegory, in a way. Certainly that's not all the book is, but it's also a pretty amazing allegory of the GLBT experience.
One day, you have friends and a home, and the next day, simply because someone finds something out about you, you lose everything and everyone.
There's another book that works as an allegory in the same way, by W.H.Thompson. It's called Sideshow. A mutation causes some people to be telepaths, and the government decides to label telepaths as ipso facto insane, and declares them wards of the state, with no rights. Just for being telepaths.
Posts: 12266 | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Exactly, Lisa. But more than that. She had become convinced that, since she was an AP, she wasn't human. Just a thing created in a lab.
The same way so many of us (including me, at the age I read Friday) became convinced that we weren't deserving of the happiness others got. Just because we're queer.
posted
That's an interesting side of Friday that I never saw before!
Chris, during the DOMWFF phase of Heinlein's career, there's always some dirty old man (Jubal, Lazurus Long, etc.) who spouts off diatribes (that seem to agree with those of all the other DOM) and has sex with lots of beautiful young women. I suppose I just made the leap to thinking those men each represent RAH himself, and the diatribes are his diatribes. Do you think that's not valid?
I'm glad to hear that he didn't try to tell someone to their face that they weren't a human being because they didn't understand higher math. I still would suspect that privately he believed in his diatribes, even if in a somewhat less exaggerated form. I wonder if he would have wanted his daughter to marry one, you know? Posts: 6246 | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think I've read The Way The Future Was. And I have read a lot of Golden Era scifi. I'm not saying that Heinlein was the only one there--just that he was one of the very best at a time when he was early enough to have thought of a lot of this stuff first.
I remember in one of my freshman math classes in college I came up with a very interesting theorem. I was quite pleased with myself, because I came up with it completely on my own. Unfortunately, some stupid guy had come up with it a couple hundred years ago . . .
(Maybe I'll dig out my old notebooks and see if I can recall which theorem it was . . . )
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Grumble]](graemlins/grumble.gif)
