posted
Hey, Noemon, you ever get a chance to go back through that thread from awhile back? You said some pretty un-nice things about me that you said you'd back up. I waited, but...
Posts: 10177 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:However, 'into my wife' absolutely is an important part of my identity, thanks kindly.
I'm not aware of anything that was said here or in the deleted thread that would call that into question.
But your judgement is not the relevant one.
It is when his is by far the majority opinion. It's you who overreacted and misinterpreted, and apparently continue to do so.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dagonee: That was old the first time you did it, Sam.
Now it's just sad and tedious.
Man I don't even understand why you would have a problem with it at all unless you totally misunderstood the meaning of it in both instances, which ... ah, yeah, I guess you did.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Man I don't even understand why you would have a problem with it at all unless you totally misunderstood the meaning of it in both instances, which ... ah, yeah, I guess you did.
Your inability to understand me does not mean that I misunderstood you.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
As long as you quit doing your blah blah dishonest restatements of other people's discussions, I don't particularly care.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
Blayne Bradley
unregistered
posted
quote:Originally posted by Dagonee:
quote:Man I don't even understand why you would have a problem with it at all unless you totally misunderstood the meaning of it in both instances, which ... ah, yeah, I guess you did.
Your inability to understand me does not mean that I misunderstood you.
Your inability to understand me does not mean that I misunderstood you.
posted
I thought the whole point of scientific integrity was that it didn't have anything to do with your character, but that certain things are self-evident and repeatable. I should think the whole point would be that there is nothing inherent to religious experience that can take the place of a well supported scientific conclusion. And that's perfectly fine.
But I've read this thread in a bit of a screwed up order. I think I went page 1, then 4, then 3 then 2.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
Back on page 2 folks were trying to draw an analogy between attacking a scientist's integrity vs. attacking a religious person's integrity. Integrity is integrity, but science should be independent of one's morals.
I mean, there's a whole other can of worms about what are morals v. ethics and all that.
Posts: 11017 | Registered: Apr 2003
| IP: Logged |
Blayne Bradley
unregistered
posted
ethics ae suporior then morals because morals are too easily bent by relative perspective.
IP: Logged |
quote:As long as you quit doing your blah blah dishonest restatements of other people's discussions, I don't particularly care.
That would be all fine and great if they were dishonest restatements and not friendly sarcasm.
Like I said, y'know. Your inability to understand me does not mean that I misunderstood you. But if you really don't care then feel free not to announce how sad and tedious you think my statements are, in all the glories of your stern affect.
quote:That would be all fine and great if they were dishonest restatements and not friendly sarcasm.
Sarcasm is, by it's nature, a dishonest restatement of something.
Moreover, they're not particularly friendly. And even if you mean them as friendly sarcasm, they are equally tedious and sad.
As you admitted, you lack the ability to understand why someone who understands your intent would have a problem with them.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by King of Men: Oddly enough, I rarely let my emotions be dictated by a majority vote of Hatrack.
You should give it a try; you might find it an improvement over letting them be dictated by homophobia and insecurity.
Posts: 5462 | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The value judgments and pronouncements about what I am or am not saying, as well as the mischaracterizations, I all expected.
What I did not expect was you parroting back my own comments in a 'no, you shut up' fashion, especially given that's included in the sarcasm that provoked you to insult me openly in the first place.
This is all coming across as really dumb to me.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
As long as you quit doing your blah blah dishonest restatements of other people's discussions, I don't particularly care.
Posts: 26071 | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
dagonee is a meanie no he isn't you're dumb no you're dumb shut up no YOU shut up now back to thread in progress.
Posts: 4753 | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
This thread reminds me of that Batman story where he compiles a list of everyone's vulnerabilities. So we know that Blayne is vulnerable to hacking, KoM to questioning his sexuality, and Dagonee to restating his words ...
Posts: 7593 | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mucus: This thread reminds me of that Batman story where he compiles a list of everyone's vulnerabilities. So we know that Blayne is vulnerable to hacking, KoM to questioning his sexuality, and Dagonee to restating his words ...
posted
But you're the MightyCow, don't you have any inherent invulnerabilities to help you combat the butcher menace?
Posts: 4753 | Registered: May 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Primal Curve: dagonee is a meanie no he isn't you're dumb no you're dumb shut up no YOU shut up now back to thread in progress.
quote:Originally posted by Primal Curve: dagonee is a meanie no he isn't you're dumb no you're dumb shut up no YOU shut up now back to thread in progress.
quote:Originally posted by Primal Curve: But you're the MightyCow, don't you have any inherent invulnerabilities to help you combat the butcher menace?
"You may continue your feeble protests," continued Sam, the frenzied hate of several generations of disaffected white hicks gleaming in his eyes, "My heterogene ray will turn us all into sissy white boys -- what will hip hop do, then?"
The council knew that if they did not intervene, it would be nothing but Country and Indie Pop until the end of time.
Posts: 15421 | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:I take it you never got my email. Is the address in your profile not one that you check?
That's my email, but I have a bunch of filters set up. I wasn't expecting a private resolution of public attacks, so I wasn't sepcifically looking for an email from you. I probably missed it.
Posts: 10177 | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
posted
I sent the message on April 8th, if you want to go back and look for it. I can't access that email account from work, but I'll forward you a copy of it when I get home, if you'd like. The gist of it was that after going over both of your posts in that thread, neither of you seemed to be exhibiting a level of snark beyond the bounds of what's generally accepted here.
Posts: 16059 | Registered: Aug 2000
| IP: Logged |
posted
My theory is that no one wants to give you the benefit of the doubt because you spend most of your time here being a condescending know-it-all holier-than-thou a-hole*.
posted
Squicky, really, let it go. All of it. There's no need for any animosity to or from anywhere to continue. Whatever you're holding a grudge for, it was a long time ago, in another country. Besides, the story is dead. You don't have to hold onto it anymore.
Posts: 1753 | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
There is no conspiracy. There is no vendetta against you. There is no, as far as I know, discussion of you at all outside of these tiresome threads. Whatever you're imagining, the reality is that this is an old, played-out story that no one wants to think about anymore. You can just let it go.
Posts: 1753 | Registered: Aug 2002
| IP: Logged |
quote:There is no conspiracy. There is no vendetta against you.
Who said there was? All I see is a clique of people who stand up for each other and attack those who criticize people inside the clique.
I don't think it is too much to ask to be treated fairly even if I am not popular, but it certainly seems to be.
kat, Even after your initial way out of line insult, you were nasty and petty in this thread and your behavior damages the forum. This is a consistent aspect of your behavior here. However, your clique mates will defend you and respond to people calling you on it with insults and unjustified attacks on the peopel bringing it up. Even Noemon, who you claimed has reined you in at times when your behavior was really out of line, won't admit that people who see your behavior as nasty may have a reason for this.
I've said multiple times, stop being nasty and you won't have any problem with me. But you really shouldn't expect people insulting me or your latest artifice to accomplish the same thing.
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cry]](graemlins/cry.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
